iRubric: Panel Discussion rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Panel Discussion

In conjunction with deliberation directives, organized, intellectual panel discussions explore four varying morals per The Scarlet Letter.

Rubric Code: A245AAC

By Irubric2229

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

DISCUSSION PANEL
	EXCEPTIONAL (N/A)	SKILLED (N/A)	DEVELOPING (N/A)	INADEQUATE (N/A)	GRADE DEMARCATIONS (N/A)
CRITICAL THINKING	EXCEPTIONAL Panel discussion members present facets of directives with indefatigable scholarly coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members present with complete confidence, speaking with authority. All panel discussion members speak eloquently, acknowledging a compelling understanding of content material. All panel discussion members remain focused.	SKILLED Panel discussion members present facets of directives with coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members present, speaking with varying authority. All panel discussion members speak, acknowledging an understanding of content material.	DEVELOPING Panel discussion members present facets of directives with limited coherence and clarity. All panel discussion members speak with inconsistent authority. All panel discussion members speak with a limited understanding of content material.	INADEQUATE Panel discussion members present facets of directives, but the information is ambiguous, lacking coherence and clarity. Panel discussion members' knowledge base is vague and unfocused.	GRADE DEMARCATIONS 33.3/100 = 33.3 33.3/95 = 32 33.3/90 = 30 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 133
PRESENTATION/APPLICATION	EXCEPTIONAL Panel discussion members apply pertinent, detailed support from sources that adds significantly and exhaustively to presentation.	SKILLED Panel discussion members apply pertinent, detailed support from sources that adds significantly to presentation.	DEVELOPING Panel discussion members apply some pertinent, detailed support from sources; however, support is somewhat ambiguous.	INADEQUATE Panel discussion members do not apply any pertinent, detailed support from sources.	GRADE DEMARCATIONS 33.3/85 = 28 33.3/80 = 27 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 133
GROUP ENTERPRISE	EXCEPTIONAL Panel discussion members exhibit exemplary collaboration, noted in noteworthy evidence and efficient transitions. All panel discussion members not only collaborate but diligently invest themselves in the delivery, through visible preparedness, through mutual respect, and through acknowledging how to lead. The panel discussion was: - clearly developed, polished and rehearsed - exceedingly interesting -audience was attentive due to credible rhetoric	SKILLED Panel discussion members exhibit significant collaboration, noted in noteworthy evidence and transitions. All panel discussion members collaborate and invest themselves in the delivery through visible preparedness and mutual respect. The panel discussion was: - clearly developed - interesting -audience was attentive due to apt rhetoric	DEVELOPING Panel discussion members exhibit a lack of collaboration, noted in evidence and transitions. The panel discussion was: - clearly not developed - insubstantial -audience found it difficult to be attentive	INADEQUATE Panel discussion members exhibit no collaboration. The panel discussion was: - ambiguous - insubstantial -audience could not sustain focus	GRADE DEMARCATIONS 33.3/75 = 25 33.3/70 = 23 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 133
EXTEMPORANEOUS COMMUNICATION	EXCEPTIONAL Panel discussion members eloquently respond to questions and comments from audience with complete coherence and clarity. Each panel discussion member Is completely confident, responding with authority. Each panel discussion member incorporates sophisticated language and is always attentive and engaged with audience, monitoring tone, volume and eye contact.	SKILLED Panel discussion members respond to questions and comments from audience with clarity. Each panel discussion member Is sufficiently confident when responding. Each panel discussion member incorporates proficient language and is always attentive to audience, monitoring tone, volume and eye contact.	DEVELOPING Panel discussion members respond to questions and comments from audience with some clarity and confidence. Each panel discussion member incorporates informal language and is somewhat attentive to audience.	INADEQUATE Panel discussion members do not respond to questions and comments from audience with clarity and/or confidence. Each panel discussion member incorporates informal language, is extremely inattentive to audience, and, as a whole, appear unprepared.	GRADE DEMARCATIONS 33.3/65 = 22 33.3/60 = 20 Each category is separately assessed. Total Points: 133

Keywords:

Panel Discussion

Subjects:

English

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric