Skip to main content
iRubric: Face to Face - Feature Collage rubric

iRubric: Face to Face - Feature Collage rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Face to Face - Feature Collage 
Students begin by drawing facial features from observation and then integrate them into a full scale self-portrait, either real or imagined. Drawing of featusing mixed media of Black and white materials: ink, ink wash, charcoal, crayons, conte crayon, chalk and oil paste.
Rubric Code: ZX32C34
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Feature Collage drawing
100 %
  Poor (No)

5 pts

Fair (No, but)

6 pts

Good (Yes, but)

7 pts

Excellent (Yes)

8 pts

Following Directions
10 %

Observe and envision

Observational drawing

Poor (No)

• Did less than half of feature drawings
• Features not life size, few anatomically correct - few detailed
Fair (No, but)

• missing some features
• Some features life size, some anatomically correct - some detailed more than others.
Good (Yes, but)

• Drew 4 eyes, 2 noses, 2 ears, 2 mouths
• Most features life size, some anatomically correct - some detailed more than others.
Excellent (Yes)

• Drew 4 eyes, 2 noses, 2 ears, 2 mouths
• Features life size, anatomically correct and proportional and detailed
Following Directions
5 %

Observe and envision

Organizing materials

Poor (No)

• Drawing plan is either incomplete or not submitted.
•missing some features
• Word map and sketches generated from it either incomplete or not submitted.
Fair (No, but)

• limited use of features features on original collage
•missing some features
• Word map and sketches generated from it are limited and not carefully considered.
Good (Yes, but)

• Selected features and arranged in an original and expressive plan
• Unused features submitted
• Word map and sketches generated from it are somewhat thought out and considered.
Excellent (Yes)

• Selected features and arranged in an original and expressive plan
• Unused features submitted
• Word map and sketches generated from it are thoroughly conceived and carefully considered.
Mastering The Material
20 %

Develop craft, engage and persist

Incorporating value, tone and mark making

Poor (No)

• Employed limited mark making
• Used a limited range of value throughout the piece
• image is heavily outlined
Fair (No, but)

• Employed some mark making
• Used some range of value throughout the piece
• Integrated some lines into areas of tone, outlines still evident
Good (Yes, but)

• Employed a variety of mark making
• Used a range of value throughout the piece
• Integrated most lines into areas of tone
Excellent (Yes)

• Employed a wide variety of mark making techniques
• Used the full range of value /tone throughout the piece
• Thoroughly integrated all of the outlines
Creativity
20 %

Express, stretch and explore


Development of an idea

Poor (No)

• Idea is weak or non existent.
• Overall concept is arbitrary not at all communicated.
• Poor consideration to figure/ground relationship
Fair (No, but)

• Idea is limited
• Overall concept is not clearly communicated.
• Limited consideration to figure/ground relationship
Good (Yes, but)

• Idea is original - not cliche
• Overall concept is good and clearly communicated.
• Good consideration to figure/ground relationship
Excellent (Yes)

• Idea is highly original and creative
• Overall concept is communicated effectively, with depth and breadth elaborating on your original idea
• Figure and background are thoroughly integrated
Craftsmanship
20 %

Develop craft

Use of pencil and attention to detail

Poor (No)

• Presentation of final drawing has smudges, rips or extraneous marks
• Image is unclear
• Intersections are confusing
Fair (No, but)

• Presentation of final drawing is somewhat clean - smudge, mark and rip free.
• Image is somewhat clear, some areas equally considered.
• Intersections and overlaps have been somewhat examined and refined.
Good (Yes, but)

• Presentation of final drawing is mostly clean - smudge, mark and rip free.
• Image is mostly clear, most areas equally considered.
• Intersections and overlaps have mostly been examined and refined
Excellent (Yes)

• Presentation of final drawing is clean - smudge, mark and rip free
• Image is clear, all areas equally considered
• Intersections and overlaps have been examined and refined, highlights and shadows fully realized
Effort
10 %

Engage and persist, reflect, understand the art world

Use of class time and
respect of fellow students

Poor (No)

• Frequently tardy
• frequently distracted, often socializing
• doesn't asks for help
• doesn't cleans up
• Careless with supplies and equipment
• Doesn't comes in outside of class to complete work
Fair (No, but)

• Occasionally tardy
• focus is inconsistent
• sometimes asks for help
• Cleans up sporadically
• Treats studio supplies and equipment respectfully
• Comes in outside of class occasionally
Good (Yes, but)

• Usually arrives on time
• Works in a mostly focused
• Asks for help mostly when needed
• Is helpful to others
• Cleans up thoroughly mostly.
• Treats studio supplies and equipment respectfully
Excellent (Yes)

• Always arrives on time
• Works in a focused manner
• Is helpful to others
• Cleans up thoroughly
• Treats studio supplies and equipment respectfully
• Comes in outside of class to complete work if needed
Effort
10 %

Reflect, engage and persist

Maintaining focus and sustaing effort throughout the process

Poor (No)

• Seldom reflects on work
• Seldom makes changes as needed, accepts criticism or make adjustments
Fair (No, but)

• Sometimes reflects on work
• Sometimes changes as needed, accepts criticism and makes adjustments
Good (Yes, but)

• Occasionally reflects on work
• Mostly makes changes as needed, accepts criticism and makes adjustments
Excellent (Yes)

• Reflects and analyzes work often
• Makes changes as needed, accepts criticism and makes adjustments
Critique
5 %

Reflect, Understand the Art World

Seeking and providing feedback

Poor (No)

• Seldom seeks input from teachers or artist classmates
• Seldom offers insightful and constructive feedback to artist classmates
Fair (No, but)

• Sometimes seeks input from teachers or artist classmates
• Sometimes offers insightful and constructive feedback to artist classmates
Good (Yes, but)

• Seeks input from teachers or artist classmates most of the time
• Offers insightful and constructive feedback to artist classmates most of the time
Excellent (Yes)

• Seeks input from teachers or artist classmates
• Offers insightful and constructive feedback to artist classmates



Keywords:
  • Face to Face, Feature Drawing


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16