Skip to main content
iRubric: VEX Robot Design rubric

iRubric: VEX Robot Design rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
VEX Robot Design 
VEX Robot Design
This rubric will be used to assess the overall design of a student's or group of students' robot that is going to be built with VEX Robotics parts. This does not include the sketch or CAD drawing of the robot. This deals with group functionality and project management as pertains to the design of the group's project.
Rubric Code: QX9BBBW
By rainandming
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Robot Design Rubric
  Excellent

8 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

2 pts

Group Dynamics

Excellent

Group follows good meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. Discussion proceeds efficiently. Group is able to focus on the relevant aspects of the robot.
Good

Group follows decent meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. For the most part discussion proceeds efficiently. For the most part group focuses on relevant aspect of robot designs.
Fair

Group follows few meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion does not have a professional tone or manner. Discussion does not proceed efficiently. Group rarely focuses on relevant aspects of robot design.
Poor

Group does not work as a team. Little discussion occurs. Discussion does not stay on topic. Group does not focus on relevant aspects of robot design.
Decision Making

Excellent

Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. All group member are able to reach consensus.
Good

Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. Most group members are able to reach a consensus.
Fair

Group member must keep pieces of their original design which may temporarily halt productive discussion. Few group members reach consensus.
Poor

Group members feel that their design is the only design. Group members never reach consensus.
Project Management

Excellent

Development is in line with timeline submitted with proposal. Group member roles and responsibilities are defined and adhered to. Schedule for future development is practical and workable.
Good

Development is mostly in line with timeline submitted with proposal. Group members have roles and responsibilities which were mostly adhered to. Schedule for future development is present and likely practical and workable.
Fair

Group members do not abide by timeline that was submitted with proposal. Group members do not adhere to clearly defined set of roles and responsibilities. Future development is present but may not be in schedule or practical and workable.
Poor

Timeline is not submitted, or timeline is disregarded during development process. Group members do not clearly define roles. No schedule for future development is created.
Project Progress

Excellent

Project shows a clear progression beyond what was available at the time of proposal. Every team member has effectively contributed to development. Decisions show evidence of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has given appropriate consideration to all aspects of development, including mechanics, programming, and testing.
Good

Project has progressed from what was available at time of proposal. Most team members have effectively contributed to development. Most decisions show evidence of use of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has spent some time considering all aspects of development.
Fair

Project has made only fair progression beyond what was available at the time of proposal. Few team members have effectively contributed to development. Decisions were made without using a decision-making process. Group has spent little time considering all aspects of development.
Poor

Project has not progressed from time of proposal. Little contribution from any team member. No clear decisions made. Group did not consider all aspects of development.
Future Plans

Excellent

Group can describe what aspects of design will be worked on next. Groups has prioritized remaining tasks to ensure project will be completed on time.
Good

Groups can give overall ideas of what future aspects of design will look like. Group has prioritized the ideas they have come up with for future design.
Fair

Groups have very little idea about future aspects of design. Group can provide a sketch of a timeline for future ideas.
Poor

Group has not thought about future aspects of design. Group has no timeline to get future tasks done.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16