iRubric: Project Records Testing - Fall 2015 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Project Records Testing - Fall 2015

Portfolio Testing Section - Fall 2012

This is the rubric for grading Testing Project Records in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by DG, v2.0, revised 03/12 by TW, v3.0, revised 05/12 by the department. v 3.1, revised 12/14 by TJV)

Rubric Code: ZXXB49B

By mcengin

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Mechanics 20 %
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts	Not Applicable (N/A)
Setting / Context 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers.	Accomplished/Good References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved.	Developing/Fair References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.	Deficient/Poor Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project.	Not Applicable
Appearance 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Exceptionally well formatted word-processed document.	Accomplished/Good Properly formatted word-processed document.	Developing/Fair Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.	Deficient/Poor Illegible or sloppy.	Not Applicable
Writing Mechanics 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors.	Accomplished/Good Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.	Developing/Fair Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.	Deficient/Poor Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…	Not Applicable
Content 80 % There are many test that an engineer may perform that do not require all of the Criteria. As an example, consider factorial testing to determine what variable(s) is critical to a design. For some exploratory issues, hypothesis testing is not the issue.
	Exemplary/Excellen 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts	Not Applicable (N/A)
Purpose of Testing 1 pts Clear Statement of Project	Exemplary/Excellen Gives a clear, valid statement of the purpose for testing.	Accomplished/Good A valid reason for doing the test is evident but is not clearly expressed.	Developing/Fair The reason given for the test is clearly stated but incorrect.	Deficient/Poor The reason given is neither clear nor correct.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Identification 1 pts Identification of Variables to be Evaluated	Exemplary/Excellen All test variable(s) are identified and expected values, if available, are quantitatively expressed.	Accomplished/Good Most test variable(s) are identified and expected values, if available, are quantitatively expressed.	Developing/Fair Significant test variables are omitted and expected values, if available, are not quantitatively expressed.	Deficient/Poor Significant test variables are omitted and expected values, if available, are not quantitatively expressed.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Experiment Design 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellen The design has a high likelihood of producing reliable data (appropriate techniques, devices, and variation).	Accomplished/Good The design has a moderate likelihood of producing reliable data (appropriate techniques, devices, and variation).	Developing/Fair An attempt has been made to address the techniques, devices, and variations, but resulting experiment is unlikely to produce reliable data.	Deficient/Poor No or little consideration given to the experiments’ techniques, devices, or statistical variation.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Test Documentation 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellen A clear reproducible test procedure, including fully annotated drawings or images of the test set up, is provided.	Accomplished/Good A reproducible test procedure with minor deficiencies is provided.	Developing/Fair The test procedure gives the general set up but does not provide enough information to reproduce the experiment.	Deficient/Poor Significant components of the test documentation are missing.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Data Collection 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellen The experiment is performed in a way that has a high likelihood of producing reliable data.	Accomplished/Good The experiment is performed in a way that has a moderate likelihood of producing reliable data.	Developing/Fair The execution of the experiment is haphazard resulting in unreliable data.	Deficient/Poor The experiment was not performed correctly.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Presentation of Data 1 pts (Results)	Exemplary/Excellen Presentation of data is orderly and complete, facilitating an independent investigator to verify results.	Accomplished/Good Data is complete, but presented in a somewhat confusing fashion, making independent verification challenging.	Developing/Fair Data is incomplete.	Deficient/Poor Data is incomplete and arranged thoughtlessly. Results cannot be verified without the assistance of the original investigator.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Analysis of Results 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellen Analysis is complete and the interpretation is thorough and accurate.	Accomplished/Good Analysis conducted is complete, but the interpretation is not complete or fully accurate.	Developing/Fair Analysis is incomplete or interpretation is flawed.	Deficient/Poor Analysis is erroneous.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Interpretation of Results 1 pts Interpretation of Results Appropriately Influences the Direction of the Project	Exemplary/Excellen Interprets and applies results in view of the purpose of the test.	Accomplished/Good Draws an appropriate conclusion from results but does not support the conclusion.	Developing/Fair Uses results to support an inappropriate conclusion.	Deficient/Poor Draws inappropriate conclusions without support from results.	Not Applicable Not Applicable

Keywords:

IPC, Integrated Projects Curriculum, testing

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric