- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ACTING rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ACTING ACTING Rubric Code: Z2X7982 By alanpatrickkenn Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

ACTING PORTFOLIO
	Unsatifactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Table of Contents 70 pts	Unsatifactory Table of content is available	Poor Table of content is included	Fair Table of content is available and includes page numbers	Good Table of content is complete, organized, and includes page numbers	Excellent Table of content is complete, easy to maneuver, well organized, and includes page numbers	POINTS EARNED
COMMUNICATION
	Unsatifactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Contact list 70 pts	Unsatifactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student include contact name	Fair Student include contact name and phone number of all cast members	Good Student include contact name, phone number, and e-mail address of all cast members	Excellent Student include contact name, phone number, mailing address, and e-mail address of all cast members	POINTS EARNED
Rehearsal conflict form 70 pts	Unsatifactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes rehearsal conflict forms of some actors in the scene	Fair Student includes rehearsal conflict forms of some actors in scene completely filled out	Good Student includes rehearsal conflict forms of most actors in scene completely filled out	Excellent Student includes rehearsal conflict forms of all actors in scene completely filled out	POINTS EARNED
Rehearsal Calendar 70 pts	Unsatifactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general rehearsal calendar of anticipated rehearsals of at least one day a week for four hours. Student includes what they intend to accomplish at each rehearsal. (four weeks rehearsal maximum)	Fair Student includes a general rehearsal calendar of anticipated rehearsals of at least three days a week for a minimum of two hours. Student includes what they intend to accomplish at each rehearsal. (four weeks rehearsal maximum)	Good Student includes a specific rehearsal calendar of anticipated rehearsals of at least three days a week for a maximum of two hours. Location and times are included. Student includes what they intend to accomplish at each rehearsal. (four weeks rehearsal maximum)	Excellent Student includes a specific rehearsal calendar of anticipated rehearsals of at least three days a week for a minimum of two hours. Specific units explored in each rehearsal is clearly recorded. Student includes what they intend to accomplish at each rehearsal. Location and times are included. (four weeks rehearsal maximum)	POINTS EARNED
ANALYSIS
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
First Script Impression 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student lists information concerning their likes/dislikes of the play script, yet it is not well supported and/ or is less than 3 paragraphs	Fair Student lists what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in less than 3 paragraphs and/or information is supported generally using the script as reference.	Good Student effectively lists what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in 3-5 paragraphs or more. Evidence is supported specifically using the script as reference.	Excellent Student effectively lists what they liked and/or disliked about their selected play in 3-5 paragraphs or more. Student has effectively supported their conclusion with specific commentary using the script as a vehicle for discussion.	POINTS EARNED
GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES Environmental facts Polar Attitudes Previous Action
Geographical Location 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student list geographical location without support and/or states geographical location is not specific	Fair Student generally includes place and/or randomly selects a location not supported by the script. Significant information is not included or supported	Good Student effectively included the exact place including climate and supports conclusion	Excellent Student effectively included the exact place including climate. Significant information delineating environmental factors pulled from tangible research is also included	POINTS EARNED
Date 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student states season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day the scenes in the play take place and/or state the significance of the date	Fair Student generally includes season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day the scenes in the play takes place. Significance of the date is general.	Good Student effectively includes season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day scenes in the play takes place. Significance of date is clearly stated and supported.	Excellent Student effectively includes and supports season(s), year(s), and time(s) of day scenes in the play takes place. Student also discusses significance of the date and includes tangible research sources.	POINTS EARNED
Economic 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student briefly states the economic environment(s) found in the play. Statement of class level is incomplete and/or discussion is severely limited.	Fair Student generally communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectively listing the class level while generally stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student research support is incomplete and/or is not adequately supported.	Good Student effectively communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectively listing the class level while stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student researches and includes discussion on one/two/or three class levels when more are present.	Excellent Student effectively communicates the economic environment(s) found in the play effectively listing the class level while stating the wealth or poverty of the characters in the play. Student researches and includes two or more economic levels if used in the play.	POINTS EARNED
Political 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally includes the relationship of the characters to the form of government under which they live.	Fair Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live.	Good Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live. Student effectively uses the script to support their conclusion. External research sources (research) is utilized and cited.	Excellent Student effectively includes the specific relationships of the characters to the form of government under which they live. The script is used well to support the student's conclusion. In addition, research is documented and supported with tangible research sources.	POINTS EARNED
Social 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally list the mores and social institutions under which the characters live.	Fair Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live.	Good Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live. The conclusion drawn is listed and supported effectively with examples from the script	Excellent Student effectively lists the mores and social institutions under which the characters live. The conclusion drawn is listed and supported effectively with examples from the script. External research sources are used and is effectively documented.	POINTS EARNED
Religious 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally lists formal and informal psychological controls.	Fair Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described.	Good Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described. Specific information from the script is documented to support conclusion.	Excellent Formal and informal psychological controls are specifically listed and described. Specific information from the script is documented to support the conclusion(s) drawn. External sources are used effectively.	POINTS EARNED
Previous Action 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally compiles a list indicating previous action. Work is not supported.	Fair Student generally includes a specific list indicating previous action located within the script. Information is documented.	Good Student effectively includes a specific list indicating and supported previous action located within the script. Information is documented.	Excellent Student effectively includes a specific list indicating and supporting previous action located within the script. Information is documented effectively using the script.	POINTS EARNED
Polar Attitudes 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student generally lists polar attitudes of one or more characters in the play and/or provides a concise explanation without listing the polar attitude.	Fair Student includes and effectively supports polar attitudes of at least one character within the play. A concise explanation of the selected attitudes are included.	Good Student includes and effectively supports polar attitudes of main characters within the play; student also includes a concise explanation of selected attitudes using the script to support their findings	Excellent Student effectively includes and supports polar attitudes of each character within the play; student also includes a concise explanation of selected attitudes using the script to support their findings	POINTS EARNED
Significance of the facts 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a brief summary statement of environmental facts.	Fair Student includes a summary statement of environmental facts, yet fails to effectively support/connect the facts to the play.	Good Student includes a strong summary statement determining how the environmental facts affect the total meaning to the play.	Excellent Student includes and supports a strong summary statement determining how the environmental facts affect the total meaning of the play. Student effectively cite sources.	POINTS EARNED
CHARACTER
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Super Objective 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Students lists a weak objective of their character (which is not supported by the dramatic action), yet fails to list the super objective. Students uses information from the script including page numbers to validate their conclusions.	Fair Student effectively list the super objective of their character yet does not effectively validate their conclusion.	Good Student lists a strong objective of their character, yet fails to list the super objective. Students uses information from the script including page numbers to validate their conclusions.	Excellent Student effectively list the super objective of their character and validates their information using information from the text including page numbers.	POINTS EARNED
CREATiNG A BIOGRAPHY
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
What the Playwright Says 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general statements of what the playwright says about the character	Fair Student provides specific yet limited statements of what the playwright says about the character	Good Student provides specific statements of what the playwright says about the character including page numbers	Excellent Student provides and supports specific statements of what the playwright says about the character including page numbers	POINTS EARNED
What the Character Says 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general statements of what the character says about themselves.	Fair Student provides specific yet limited statements of what the character says about themselves	Good Student provides specific statements of what the character says about themselves including page numbers	Excellent Student provides and supports specific statements of what the character says about themselves including page numbers	POINTS EARNED
What other characters say 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general statements of what the other characters say about the character.	Fair Student provides specific yet limited statements of what other characters say about the character	Good Student provides specific statements of what some characters says about the character including page numbers	Excellent Student provides and supports specific statements of what other characters say about the character including page numbers.	POINTS EARNED
The Character's Actions 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general statements of the characters actions	Fair Student provides specific yet undocumented analysis of the character's actions.	Good Student provides specific and documented analysis of the character's actions including page numbers.	Excellent Student provides specific and documented analysis of the character's actions including page numbers and corresponding texts.	POINTS EARNED
Intangibles 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor Student provides general, unsupported statements of the intangibles (Imagination, instinct, inspiration, impulse, identification, intuition, insight)	Fair Student provides general yet supported statements of the intangibles (Imagination, instinct, inspiration, impulse, identification, intuition, insight)	Good Student provides specific and documented analysis of the intangibles including page numbers. Analysis is viable when considering environmental factors, polar attitudes, and previous action.	Excellent Student provides specific and documented analysis of the intangibles including page numbers and corresponding texts. Analysis is viable when considering environmental factors, polar attitudes, and previous action.	POINTS EARNED
Biographical/ Characters Elements 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair Student completes Biographical Elements and Character Elements chart without considering given circumstances of the play.	Good Student completes Biographical Elements and Character Elements chart while considering the play's given circumstances.	Excellent Student completes Biographical Elements and Character Elements chart while considering the play's given circumstances. The chart is extensive and encompasses the entire play.	POINTS EARNED
Character Biography Templete
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
pgs. 1-10 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair A portion of questions are arbitrarily answered; answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Good All questions are answered yet are not in-depth. Answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Excellent All questions are answered specifically relating to the given circumstances of the play.	POINTS EARNED
pgs. 11-24 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair A portion of questions are arbitrarily answered; answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Good All questions are answered yet are not in-depth. Answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Excellent All questions are answered specifically relating to the given circumstances of the play.	POINTS EARNED
pgs. 25-36 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements	Poor N/A	Fair A portion of questions are arbitrarily answered; answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Good All questions are answered yet are not in-depth. Answers do not directly correspond to the given circumstances of the play.	Excellent All questions are answered specifically relating to the given circumstances of the play.	POINTS EARNED
Idea
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Theme Statement 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general If/then statement.	Fair Student includes a general If/then statement and supports statement using internal sources. Statement is geared towards characters within the play as opposed to the audience.	Good Student includes a specific If/then statement and supports statement using internal and/or external sources. Statement maybe geared towards characters within the play as opposed to the audience.	Excellent Student includes a specific major and minor If/then statement and supports statements using internal and/or external sources. Statement is geared toward the audience as opposed to the individual characters within the play.	POINTS EARNED
Meaning of Title 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and/or states "a meaning does not exist"	Fair Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and supports it generally using evidence from the script	Good Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it generally using evidence from the script	Excellent Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it specific using evidence from the script and/or external sources	POINTS EARNED
Tools in Staging
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Ground plan 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Ground plan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage.	Fair Ground plan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Ground plan has at least 3 acting areas.	Good Ground plan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Ground plan has at least 5 acting areas. The Ground plan supports the dramatic action.	Excellent Ground plan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Ground plan has at least 5 acting areas. The ground plan supports the dramatic action of the piece and is well balanced. A concise summary of ground plan and dramatic action is included and internal/external support is clearly given.	POINTS EARNED
Units/ Objectives 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Units and objectives are generally indicated	Poor Units are well marked; actor's objectives include a verb	Fair Units are well marked; actor's objectives include a verb. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	Good Units are well marked; actor's objectives include a verb and receiver. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	Excellent Units are well marked; actor's objectives include a verb, receiver, and desired response. Units and objectives are effectively integrated.	POINTS EARNED
Blocking 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Prompt book is created to accommodate written blocking. General blocking is included.	Poor Prompt book is effectively created to accommodate blocking. General blocking is included and properly scored.	Fair Prompt book is effectively created to accommodate blocking. Specific blocking is included and properly scored. Blocking goes with dramatic action. Correspondence is effectively included on the ground plan.	Good Prompt book is effectively created to accommodate blocking. Specific blocking is included and properly scored. Blocking consistently goes with dramatic action. Correspondence is effectively included on the ground plan. activity is clearly indicated.	Excellent Prompt book is effectively created to accommodate blocking. Specific blocking is included and properly scored. Blocking consistently goes with dramatic action. Correspondence is effectively included on the ground plan. activity is clearly indicated. Appropriate abbreviations and acting areas are well utilized.	POINTS EARNED
Journal
	Unsatifactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Online/ hardcopy 70 pts	Unsatifactory Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements	Poor Online journal entries are completed within 24 hours of rehearsal sessions. Includes general information concerning process	Fair Online journal entries are completed within 24 hours of rehearsal sessions. Includes specific information concerning process.	Good Online journal entries are completed within 24 hours of rehearsal sessions. Includes specific information concerning process. Includes an attendance record, summary, extend/apply, connect/compare, agree/disagree, discover/interpret, question, synthesize, revise, inform. Contains journal headings (last name, date, number of entry, topic of entry, title of entry, 200-300 words)	Excellent Online journal entries are completed within 24 hours of rehearsal sessions. Includes specific information concerning process. Includes an attendance record, summary, extend/apply, connect/compare, agree/disagree, discover/interpret, question, synthesize, revise, inform. Contains journal headings (last name, date, number of entry, topic of entry, title of entry, 200-300 words) Online journal entries are printed and placed in portfolio.	POINTS EARNED
Miscellaneous
	Unsatisfactory 0 pts	Poor 10 pts	Fair 30 pts	Good 50 pts	Excellent 70 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
Bibliography 70 pts	Unsatisfactory Sources are not cited	Poor Sources are listed and/or improperly cited	Fair Some sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format	Good All sources are listed yet are improperly cited using MLA format (books, articles, web pages, photos, etc.)	Excellent All sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format (books, articles, web pages, photos, etc.)	POINTS EARNED

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric