Skip to main content

iRubric: Ceramic Whimsical Teapot rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ceramic Whimsical Teapot 
Students will create an original Ceramic teapot that is either Unusual or whimsical in its design
Rubric Code: YXC8B65
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Cultural Ceramic Mask
  Excellent

6 pts

Strong

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Moderate

3 pts

Weak

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Creativity; Design Concept

Excellent

3 research photos; sketches original, excellent and in notebook; design approved; template for tea pot shows interior design and meets size requirement.
Strong

Research photos are complete; sketches are strong and mostly original and in notebook; design is approved and template meets size and interior design requirement.
Good

Research photos are complete; sketches are good and mostly original and in notebook; design is approved and template mostly meets size and interior design requirement.
Moderate

Research photos are incomplete; sketches are moderate and mostly copied; design template nearly meets size requirement; interior design could be stronger.
Weak

Research photos are incomplete or non-existent; sketches are weak or incomplete; work shows little originality; design does not meet size requirement for the template
Poor

None of the requirements for this criteria have been met.
Technical Skills; Craftsmanship

Excellent

Teapot functions fully, has all required elements ( fitted lid, spout, handle. Knob, foot) no obvious tool marks and glaze is applied evenly and effectively
Strong

Teapot functions for the most part. has all required elements ( fitted lid, spout, handle. Knob, foot) no obvious tool marks and glaze is applied evenly and effectively, with minimal errors
Good

Teapot functions but with issues. Has all required elements ( fitted lid, spout, handle. Knob, foot) fit and finish are lacking, glaze is applied unevenly craftsmanship could be improved.
Moderate

Teapot does not fully function, Teapot is missing one or more of the required elements. Lid does not fit properly and glaze is not properly applied
Weak

Teapot does not function,or is not finished Teapot is missing one or more of the required elements. Lid does not fit properly and glaze is not properly applied or is not finished.
Poor

None of the requirements for this criteria have been met.
Design elements

Excellent

Design for the teapot is clearly thought out, the teapot is unusual with a clear theme. color clearly enhances the form; precise and careful attention to detail.
Strong

Design for the teapot is obvious, the teapot is unusual with a clear theme. colors were chosen with thought. precise and careful attention to detail.
Good

Surface design shows ability to mix paint but all color may not be mixed; color scheme is somewhat evident; some attention to detail.
Moderate

Design for the teapot is not clear, lacks any unusual or whimsical elements Color used does not enhance the work. Some obvious issues with craftsmanship
Weak

NO clear design for teapot. Theme is not present. Major flaws with design elements, the various pieces do not fit the whole .
Poor

None of the requirements for this criteria have been met.
Embellishment with Mixed-Media

Excellent

Excellent choice of mixed-media to embellish Teapot and clearly enhance the overall aesthetic appeal.
Strong

Mixed-media strongly adds to the overall aesthetic appeal of the Teapot
Good

Mixed-media choice good but does not greatly increase the aesthetic appeal of the Teapot
Moderate

Teapot has some mixed-media embellishment.
Weak

Teapot has very little mixed-media embellishment.
Poor

None of the requirements for this criteria have been met.
Work Ethic and Stuido Time

Excellent

Student consistently used every minute of class time wisely; constantly challenging self to reflect, revise, and employ studio habits of mind.
Strong

Student mostly used every minute of class time wisely with consistent reflection, revision and work to develop craft.
Good

Student often used every minute of class time well and did some revision when prompted.
Moderate

Student did not always use class time well nor did student challenge self or revise.
Weak

Student rarely used class time well and showed no effort to challenge self or revise work.
Poor

Student never used class time well and never challenged self to revise work.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n112