Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Newspaper Article Review rubric

iRubric: Newspaper Article Review rubric

preview rubric

 
  view all assessments  

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Newspaper Article Review

  Derived from rubric: Health/fitness Article Review
built by rsorens

Rubric Code: Y4995C
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Physical Ed., Fitness  
Types: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12


Powered by iRubric Newspaper Article Review
  Good
5 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Missing/Unacceptable
0 pts
Article Selection
Good

- The source was a reliable website or newspaper/magazine.
- The author and date of the article were cited.
- The article was up-to-date, within the time-frame specified, and stapled to the review.
Fair

- The source was a reliable website or newspaper/magazine.
- The information appeared to be recent, however, the date and/or author were not cited with in the paper.
- Article was attached to the review.
Poor

- The validity of the source was questionable.
- The date and author was not given.
- Article was not attached to the review.
Missing/Unacceptable

- There was no source cited within the review.
- Article was not attached to the review.
- Topic was inappropriate for this assignment.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Fair

- For the most part, rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise.
Poor

- Review contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Missing/Unacceptable

- Review contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Article Summary
Good

- The summary exceeded the stated requirements. All relevant information was listed and elaborated upon.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Fair

- The summary met all the stated requirements.
- Major points are addressed and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Poor

- The summary recalled some information, but left out several important points.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Missing/Unacceptable

- The summary was inadequate and too brief.
- Most of the information was left out or incomplete.
- Points are unclear.
Opinion & Critical Evaluation
Good

- Opinion is fully supported by facts.
- Review demonstrates outstanding level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.
- Evidence is well identified and evaluated.
Fair

- Opinion on topic has some support.
- Review demonstrates a good level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.
- Evidence is identified and evaluated.
Poor

- Opinion has no support.
- Review demonstrates a fair level of critical evaluation and thinking about the evidence presented in the article.
- Evidence is either not identified or evaluated.
Missing/Unacceptable

- Opinion is not stated.
- Review demonstrates a poor level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.
- Evidence not identified or evaluated.
Personal Reflection
Good

- Connections were made between the information and more than one dimension of health.
- Personal conclusions were drawn as information related to personal health.
- Numerous connections were made to personal goals and course material.
Fair

- Connections were made between the information and one dimension of health.
- One clear connection was made in relation to personal goals and course material.
Poor

- The personal response to the article did not fully relate the information to any of the dimensions of health.
- Connections in relation to personal goals and course material were unclear.
Missing/Unacceptable

- Personal reaction to the article was undeveloped or missing.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
Copyright © 2019 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.