iRubric: Visual Arts rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Visual Arts

Rubric adresses standards 2&3. http://nationalartsstandards.org/sites/default/files/Visual%20Arts%20MCAs/Visual%20Arts%20MCAs%20Corrected%20%23's/VA,%20MCA,%20Secondary%20Proficient,%20Arial,%205-9-14.pdf

Rubric Code: XX383XW

By jgrega

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	No evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 1 pts	Poor evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 3 pts	Limited evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 5 pts	Sufficient evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 7 pts	Strong evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 9 pts	Excellent evidence Degree to which performance standard has been met. 10 pts
Craftsmanship Enter description	No evidence >No evidence of care, effort, planning and/or concern for quality. >Student disregards or is completely inable to control safely and skillfully the use of materials, tools, and equipment. >Student's work is largely incomplete.	Poor evidence >Lack of care, effort, planning and/or concern for quality. >Art work is messy and/or largely incomplete. (ie.shows smudge marks, erasure lines and rips, tears, or folds) >Student needs to work on controlling safely and skillfully the use of materials, tools, and equipment.	Limited evidence >Areas lack of care, effort, planning and/or concern for quality. >Art work is somewhat messy and/or partially incomplete. >Control is somewhat lacking in the safe and skillful use of materials, tools, and equipment.	Sufficient evidence >Work shows some care, effort, planning and/or concern for quality. >Art work appears neat and finished. (ie. shows very little evidence of smudge marks, few erasure lines, rips, tears, or folds.) >The medium's application is in a manner consistant with safe and skillful use of materials, tools, and equipment.	Strong evidence >Evidence of care, effort, planning, and high quality. >Art work is impeccable and carefully finished. (ie. no evidence of smudge marks,erasure lines, rips, tears, or folds) >The medium's careful logical application is in a manner consistant with safe and skillful use of materials, tools, and equipment.	Excellent evidence >Exceeds expectations of care, effort, planning and/or concern for quality. >The medium's carefully preplanned, sequential, and logical application show mastery of safe and skillful use of materials, tools, and equipment.
Composition Enter description	No evidence >Art work lacks planning, technique, and/or understanding of art concepts. >Space is left mainly blank, little area drawn on and/or haphazardly designed without intent.	Poor evidence >The student does not appear to be able to apply most design principles to his/her own work. >There is little regard to size, scale, or orientaion.	Limited evidence Student tries to apply design principles (ie. unity, contrast, balance, movement, direction, emphasis, and center of interest) but the overall result is not pleasing	Sufficient evidence Student applies design principles (ie. unity, contrast, balance, movement, direction, emphasis, and center of interest) with fair skill.	Strong evidence Student applies design principles (ie. unity, contrast, balance, movement, direction, emphasis, and center of interest) with great skill	Excellent evidence >Art work shows a mastery of advanced techniques in compositon. >The student intentionally exploits characteristics of design elements and principles to promote style, mood and/or meaning.
Content- application Concept application and synthesis.	No evidence >Student does not apply any relevant criteria to the art making process.	Poor evidence >Does not develop a work of art that communicates a theme or idea. >Either does not revise art work or does not apply relevant criteria when revising art work.	Limited evidence >Either develops a work of art that communicates a theme or idea, or uses a art-making approach. >Revises artwork but does not apply relevant criteria.	Sufficient evidence >Using a artmaking approach, develops a work of art that communicates a theme or idea. >Applies relevant criteria from traditional and contemporary contexts when revising art work	Strong evidence >Using an artmaking approach, effectively develops a work of art that communicates a complex theme or idea. >Develops and applies relevant criteria from traditional and contemporary contexts, when revising art work.	Excellent evidence >Exceeds expectations by researching and expanding on the application of content. >Using a contemporary artmaking approach, effectively develops a work of art that communicates a complex current theme or idea.
Content - understanding Reflection,critical response, and understanding	No evidence >Student cannot identify any characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied nor can they describe how these characteristics are used in an artwork.	Poor evidence >Does not explain how traditional and nontraditional materials may impact human health and the environment and does not safely and skillfully use materials, tools, and equipment. >Student cannot accurately name characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied OR cannot describe how characteristics relate to an artwork.	Limited evidence Demonstrates safe handling of materials, tools, and equipment, but does not explain how traditional and non-traditional materials may impact human health and the environment. >Student can accurately name characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied and describe how of these characteristics are used in an paintings.	Sufficient evidence Explains how traditional and non-traditional materials may impact human health and the environment and safely and skillfully uses materials, tools, and equipment. >Student can accurately name characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied and describe how these characteristics are used in their own paintings.	Strong evidence Researches, correlates information, and explains how traditional and non-traditional materials may impact human health and the environment and safely and skillfully uses materials, tools, and equipment. >Student can accurately explain characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied and describe how these characteristics are used in his/her own paintings.	Excellent evidence Researches, correlates information, and explains how traditional and non-traditional materials may impact human health and the environment and safely and skillfully uses materials, tools, and equipment. >Student can accurately explain characteristics of the period, technique, materials, tools, and equipment being studied and describe how these characteristics are used in his/her own paintings.
Creativity / Originality	No evidence >Student has not made an attempt to meet the requirements of the assignment.	Poor evidence >Student has copied some from the source material without elaboration. There is little evidence of creativity.	Limited evidence >Student has copied some from the source material. There is little evidence of creativity, but the student has done part of the assignment.	Sufficient evidence >Student has taken the technique being studied and has used source material as a starting place. The student's personality comes through in parts of the painting.	Strong evidence >Student has taken the technique being studied and has used source material as a starting place. The student's personality comes through in parts of the painting.	Excellent evidence >Student has taken the technique being studied and applied it in a way that is totally his/her own. The student's personality/voice comes through.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric