iRubric: CAD 3D Solar Heater Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

CAD 3D Solar Heater Rubric

CAD 3D Building Guide

Rubric used to assess the building guide for the reproduction of a 3D Solar Water Heater

Rubric Code: WXA5A74

By DiehlEngineer

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Fusion Solar Water Heat 3D Modeling
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Individual Drawings Parts	Poor Individual part is duplicated to 70-79% accuracy.	Fair Individual part is duplicated to 80-89% accuracy.	Good Individual part is duplicated to 90-99% accuracy.	Excellent Individual part is duplicated with 100% accuracy.
Step by Step Generation	Poor Details/features are not completed to full detail.	Fair Details/features are not completed to full detail. Many intermediate steps are not shown as a transition.	Good Details/features are missing a few steps, could be broken down into more details.	Excellent All details/features are present.
Dimensions/Measurement	Poor All individual part drawings are dimensioned. Individual part can not be manufactured with the information given.	Fair All individual part drawings are dimensioned. Individual part would be difficult to manufacturer.	Good All individual part drawings are dimensioned. Individual part still could be manufactured from the information given.	Excellent All individual part drawings are properly dimensioned. Individual part could be manufactured from the information given.
Technical Language	Poor Target language is not used effectively.	Fair Target language is attempted to demonstrate an understanding of CAD terms/commands but is lacking more key terms.	Good Target language is attempted to demonstrate an understanding of CAD terms/commands.	Excellent Target language is used to demonstrate high level of understanding of CAD terms/commands.
Print Out-Guide	Poor Individual part drawings are not properly formatted and not printed on the color guide layout.	Fair Individual drawings are not properly formatted attempt to use the color guide layout was not successful.	Good Individual part drawings are properly formatted and printed on the color guide layout is not complete.	Excellent All individual part drawings are properly formatted and printed on the color guide layout satisfactorily.
Print Out-CAD Drawing	Poor Drawings do not include the appropriate views. Drawing not on the CAD Template Boarder.	Fair Drawings include dimensions, but two or more views are missing. CAD Template Boarder but not updated.	Good Drawings include dimensions, but there is one view missing. CAD Template Boarder with info updated.	Excellent Drawings include dimensions, appropriate views (front, top, side, for the orthographic and the Isometric). CAD Template Boarder with info updated
Following Directions	Poor Final project not completed.	Fair Final project completed with two or more components (print-outs, file saved to appropriate location) missing.	Good Final project completed with one component (print-outs or file saved to appropriate location) missing.	Excellent Final project completed with all print-outs (individual parts, orthographic assembly) turned in and files saved to the appropriate location.

Keywords:

AutoDesk 3D Modeling

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric