iRubric: Portfolio Reflection - Fall 2012 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Portfolio Reflection - Fall 2012

This is the rubric for grading the Reflections in the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by TW, v1.1, revised 09/12 by TV)

Rubric Code: W66XB5

By mcengin

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Portfolio Reflection Enter rubric description
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts
Setting / Context 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers	Accomplished/Good References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved	Developing/Fair References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.	Deficient/Poor Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project.
Appearance 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Properly formatted word-processed document on “resume-quality” paper.	Accomplished/Good Properly formatted word-processed document.	Developing/Fair Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.	Deficient/Poor Illegible or sloppy.
Writing Mechanics 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors	Accomplished/Good Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.	Developing/Fair Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.	Deficient/Poor Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…
Relection 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Summary, mastery of the category, and personal growth represented by the entry.	Accomplished/Good Summary of the student’s contribution and an explanation of how the entry demonstrates the mastery of the category	Developing/Fair Pure summary of the student’s contribution to entry.	Deficient/Poor Rambling gibberish. It appears the writer is trying to fill in empty space.