Skip to main content

iRubric: PsychPortal Journal Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
PsychPortal Journal Assignment 
Rubric Code: W3266W
By khutton
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Evaluation Criteria
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

CONTENT

Poor

Most responses are a summary of PsychPortal content
Fair

Many responses are a summary of PsychPortal content
Good

Responses included analysis of PsychPortal content with only minimal summarizing
Excellent

Responses include analysis of PsychPortal content and introduce interesting angles from which to explore topic
content

Poor

Responses show a poor understanding of course theories, concepts, and ideas relevant to PsychPortal content
Fair

Responses show an adequate understanding of course theories, concepts, and ideas relevant to PsychPortal content
Good

Responses show a solid understanding of course theories, concepts, and ideas relevant to PsychPortal content
Excellent

Responses show a full understanding of course theories, concepts, and ideas relevant to PsychPortal content
content

Poor

No references to related course concepts
Fair

References to related course concepts are inaccurate, irrelevant, or incomplete
Good

For the most part, references to course concepts are accurate, relevant, and complete
Excellent

References to course concepts are complete, relevant and accurate
content

Poor

No helpful examples are included to support responses
Fair

Few helpful examples are included to support responses
Good

Some helpful examples are included to support responses
Excellent

Many helpful examples are included to support responses
content

Poor

Answers show minimal analysis and include misconceptions of the central concepts
Fair

Answers deal with material on a concrete, literal level
Good

Comprehension is on an inferential level but included the key skills of synthesis and analysis
Excellent

Uses skills of evaluation as well as analysis and synthesis
content

Poor

Author shared no new insights
Fair

Author shared few new insights
Good

Author shared several new insights
Excellent

Author shared many new and interesting insights
MECHANICS
completion

Poor

Assignment is incomplete
Fair

Assignment is complete but reads like a rough draft
Good

Assignment is complete
Excellent

Assignment is complete and exceeds expectations
language

Poor

Language uses jargon and/or conversational tone
Fair

Language lacks clarity and/or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone
Good

Language is clear and does not include jargon or conversation tone.
Excellent

Language is clear and precise and tone is appropriate for a college level writing assignment
mechanics

Poor

Mechanical and/or grammatical errors interfered with the reader’s understanding of the material.
Fair

Proofreading needed. Assignment contained many mechanical and/or grammatical errors
Good

Well written, but contained some mechanical and/or grammatical errors
Excellent

Well written, containing few if any mechanical and/or grammatical errors
format

Poor

Assignment was not formatted according to the assignment directions which interfered with the evaluation of the assignment. Please review the assignment directions.
Fair

Assignment was not formatted according to the assignment directions but it did not interfere with the evaluation of the assignment. Please review the assignment directions.
Good

Assignment was mostly formatted according to the assignment directions. Please review the assignment directions.
Excellent

Assignment was fully formatted according to the assignment directions.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58