Skip to main content
iRubric: Prac investigation rubric

iRubric: Prac investigation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Prac investigation 
prac investigation
Rubric Code: VX74WA8
By mrsnich
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric prac investigation criterai
  not included

(N/A)

1

1 pts

2

2 pts

3

3 pts

log book

not included

not submitted.
1

submitted. Entries incomplete or include minimal detail
2

submitted. some entries completed, include detailed responses
3

submitted. comprehensive details included.
title

not included

omitted
1

stated as topic
2

stated as a simple research question
3

states as research question included and incorporates IV and DV
introduction

not included

No explanation for undertaking investigation.
does not include aim.
1

Some explanation for undertaking investigation.
Psychological concepts referred to. Limited links to the investigation.
2

Clear explanation for undertaking investigation.
Psychological concepts defined. Some reference to previous research. Linked to the investigation.
3

Clear explanation for undertaking investigation.
Psychological concepts comprehensively defined. Detailed reference to relevant previous research. Concepts effectively integrated to the investigation
hypothesis

not included

Not explicitly stated
1

Variables not accurately identified. includes prediction of outcome
2

IV and DV identified.
Population included. Includes prediction of outcome
3

IV and DV identified and operationalised.
Population included. Includes prediction of outcome
methodology

not included

Participants, materials and procedure absent.
Experimental design not included / demonstrated little understanding
1

Participants, materials and procedure included
Experimental design not included / demonstrated little understanding
2

Participants, materials and procedure included.
Experimental design reflected some understanding
3

Participants, materials and procedure clearly detailed.
Method appropriately designed to address research questions
ethical considerations

not included

Ethical guidelines not included
1

Ethical guidelines discussed in log book only
2

Ethical guidelines outlined without links to investigation
3

Ethical guidelines comprehensively explained and linked to investigation
Results

not included

Data not appropriately presented so that trends are difficult to identify.
Descriptive statistics /table / graph not included
1

Data appropriately presented to illustrate trends
Descriptive statistics /table / graph not included.
2

Data appropriately presented to illustrate trends
Descriptive statistics /table / graph included.
3
discussion

not included

Analysis of primary data is inaccurate.
Hypothesis not explicity accepted / rejected.
Interpretation of results is missing /or a restatement of results
1

Analysis of primary data is accurate.
Hypothesis not explicitly accepted / rejected.
Interpretation of results is missing /or a restatement of results.
No links to relevant psychological concepts.
2

Analysis of primary data is accurate.
Hypothesis is accepted / rejected.
Interpretation of results is superficial.
Results are linked with relevant psychological concepts.
3

Analysis of primary data is accurate.
Hypothesis is accepted / rejected.
Interpretation of results is comprehensive .
results are effectively linked with relevant psychological concepts.
discussion

not included

presence / absence of outliers not mentioned
1

presence / absence of outliers noted.
2
3
discussion

not included

no comment on limitations in data or method
1

Some limitations in data and method are included with appropriate suggested improvements
2

Identification of limitations in data and method are evident and suggested improvements appropriately address most of the flaws identified in the investigation
3

Identification of limitations in data and method are comprehensive and suggested improvements appropriately address each of the flaws identified in the investigation
conclusion

not included

no clear conclusion incluced
1

Conclusion reflects a basic response to the question and Interpretation of the data and the hypothesis mostly correct
2

Conclusion reflects an appropriate response to the question and shows correct interpretation of the data and the hypothesis.
3

Conclusion reflects an appropriate response to the question and shows correct interpretation of the data and the hypothesis.
suggests possible implications / applications of the findings.
references

not included

not included
1

references included.
no material included was sourced.
2

references to all quoted and sourced material included and follows the correct format
3




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16