Skip to main content
iRubric: Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation rubric

iRubric: Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation 
Sport Management (T & P) Budget Project & Presentation
Assessment rubric for graduate students' Budget Project and Class Presentation in Sport Management
Rubric Code: V56838
By martinsons
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Sport Manage. Budget Prep & Present
  Excellent

4 pts

Very Good

3 pts

Average

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Unacceptable

0 pts

Budget Preparation/Research/Project

Excellent

Budget preparation , reseach, and project were excellently done
Very Good

Budget preparation , reseach, and project were very good
Average

Budget preparation , reseach, and project were average and met standard norms
Poor

Budget preparation , reseach, and project were at the beginning level of performance
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Appearance/ Poise

Excellent

Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence
Very Good

Appearance and poise were professional
Average

Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms
Poor

Appearance not professional and presenter not poised
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Depth of Project / Purpose

Excellent

Depth of project and purpose were excellently executed
Very Good

Depth of project and purpose were very well executed
Average

Depth of project and purpose were average and met standard norms
Poor

Depth of project and purpose were at beginning level of performance
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Technological Execution

Excellent

Technological execution was execellently demonstrated
Very Good

Technological execution was very good
Average

Technological execution was average and met standard noms
Poor

Technological execution was at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content

Excellent

Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident
Very Good

Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content
Average

Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms
Poor

Knowledge and content at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Presentation/ Delivery Style

Excellent

Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture
Very Good

Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good
Average

Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms
Poor

Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts)

Excellent

Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology
Very Good

Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed
Average

Creativity in presentation was average and met standard norms
Poor

Lacks creativity
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Organization/ Flow/ Time

Excellent

Organizational skills, flow of the presentation, project, time execution were excellent
Very Good

Organizational skills, flow of presentation, project, time utilization were very good
Average

Presentation, project organization, flow, time utilization were average and met standard norms
Poor

Presentation, project were poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations

Excellent

Finish, conclusions, recommendations were excellent and superbly executed
Very Good

Finish, conclusions, recomendations were greatly evident and very good
Average

Finish, conclusions, recomendations were average and met standard norms
Poor

Finish, conclusions, recommendations were at begining level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Assignment Execution

Excellent

Assignment execution was excellent
Very Good

Assignemnt was very well executed
Average

Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms
Poor

Assignment performance was executed at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy



Keywords:
  • Research, sport managment, thoeries, principles, project


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16