Skip to main content

iRubric: Evaluating Sources rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Questions to ask about the information source you're thinking of using.

Evaluating Information Sources Questions to ask about the information source you are thinking of using
	Poor or Unknown Low quality, unreliable. 0 pts	Fair Medium quality and reliability, or has both good and bad aspects. 1 pts	Good High quality, reliable. 2 pts
Timeliness/Currency 2 pts How recent or up-to-date is its content? (and how important is that to you?)	Poor or Unknown Information is out of date. New information has either contradicted it, changed or added to it. Old-fashioned biases and bigotry.	Fair Information is older but hasn't been contradicted or substantially changed or added to since it was published. (This rarely happens in the sciences but is somewhat common in the social sciences and very common in the humanities.)	Good Information is as current as it can get. Less than 2 years old for sciences. Less than 5 years old for social sciences and humanities.
Purpose 2 pts What is the intended purpose? (Think educate/inform, sell something, entertain, change minds/behavior, even propaganda/hate speech)	Poor or Unknown Purpose is to entertain, sell you something, or persuade you and they have used sketchy techniques like deception, emotional manipulation, logical fallacies, weasel words, loaded language, etc. May try to look like an informational/educational purpose but is actually propaganda.	Fair Purpose is to entertain, sell you something or persuade you but no sketchy techniques are used, and information is provided that can be verified from external sources.	Good Purpose is to inform or educate.
Audience 2 pts Is the target audience appropriate for your use? (Think age group, educational level)	Poor or Unknown Target audience is children or a group of people who all share the same ideology.	Fair Target audience is non-experts.	Good Target audience is fellow experts, scholars and students in the subject area.
Agenda 2 pts What, if any, ideological slant did the author write for?	Poor or Unknown Tries to conceal actual agenda. Hate groups, conspiracy theorists, denialist groups.	Fair Transparency, but there is a religious, political, or other ideological point of view.	Good Transparency. No ideological slant to the information source. However, there may be influenced by cultural or disciplinary paradigms and schemata.
Authority 2 pts Who is the creator of the information source, and what kind of expertise and experience do they have?	Poor or Unknown Creator has no academic background in the subject and no work experience in the subject. Doesn't appear to have done their research either.	Fair Creator may not have any academic or career background in the subject but has obviously educated themself thoroughly. May be an amateur expert or a student.	Good Creator has a PhD in the subject from an accredited institution, publications on the subject in reputable journals or from reputable publishers, has a job working in the field at a reputable organization.
Type of publisher 2 pts Is this a formal publisher with a reputation to uphold?	Poor or Unknown Self-published, vanity press, personal web site or blog	Fair Information put out by an organization, but not a publisher. For example, a government agency, corporation, or non-profit organization.	Good Book publisher, newspaper, magazine, etc.
Quality control? 2 pts What kinds of quality control has the information source been through?	Poor or Unknown No quality control that can be determined.	Fair Editing, such as done by a newspaper, magazine, commercial book publisher.	Good Peer review, and/or found in an academic library's collection.
Logical Fallacies 2 pts Are there any logical fallacies? Check http://logicalfallacies.info	Poor or Unknown Logical fallacies can be found. (It is helpful to note them down.)	Fair Minor logical fallacies, such as something that might be construed as slippery slope. But there is room to give them the benefit of the doubt.	Good No logical fallacies can be found.
Research Methods 2 pts Did the information source gain its information using appropriate means?	Poor or Unknown Humanities research not based on primary sources, or they are irrelevant, misinterpreted, or faked. Social sciences and sciences research uses bad study design, like not controlling for variables or not selecting a sample that represents the population.	Fair Possibly questionable use of primary sources, such as interpreting a document in a radically different way from other authorities. Possibly questionable research methods, such as a sample that isn't representative or a variable that isn't controlled for, but they address those problems in the paper.	Good Humanities research based on real primary sources. Sciences and social sciences research is based on well-designed experiments/observations.
Accuracy 2 pts Are the facts correct?	Poor or Unknown Lies and errors.	Fair Some minor aspects may be called into question by other sources. The inconsistencies do not affect the usefulness of those facts for your research purposes.	Good Facts in the information source match what can be found in other information sources or by real world testing.

Keywords:

information literacy, evaluating sources, authority, reliability, info lit

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Handout rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n7