Skip to main content
iRubric: Ceramic Whistles rubric

iRubric: Ceramic Whistles rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ceramic Whistles 
Ceramic Whistles
Rubric Code: UXW2X47
By norewebe
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Best 21-25 pts

25 pts

Good 16-20 pts

21 pts

Fair 11- 15 pts

17 pts

Poor 10 or less pts

13 pts

Creativity
1 pts

Best 21-25 pts

Totally original design, no element is an exact copy of designs seen in source material.
Good 16-20 pts

Most of the whistle elements are unique, but one element may be copied from source material.
Fair 11- 15 pts

Some aspects of the whistle are unique, but several elements are copied from source materials or other students.
Poor 10 or less pts

The whistle is a copy of a whistle seen in source material or one made by another student (80% or more of elements are copied).
Attractiveness/Craftsmanship
2 pts

Best 21-25 pts

The whistle shows that the creator took great pride in his/her work. The design and construction look carefully planned. The item is neat (free of unwanted bumps, and marks)
Good 16-20 pts

The whistle shows that the creator took pride in his/her work. The design and construction look planned. The item has a few areas that could have been improved (unwanted bumps, and marks), but these do not detract from the overall look.
Fair 11- 15 pts

The design and construction were planned. The item has several areas that could have been improved (unwanted bumps, and marks) that detract from the over all form.
Poor 10 or less pts

The whistle looks thrown together at the last minute. It appears that little design or planning was done. Craftsmanship is poor.
Time and Effort
2 pts

Best 21-25 pts

Class time was used wisely. Much time and effort went into the planning and design of the whistle. It is clear the student worked hard.


:)
Good 16-20 pts

Class time was used wisely. The student could have put more time and effort in planning.
Fair 11- 15 pts

Class time was not always used wisely, but student did do some planning.
Poor 10 or less pts

Class time was not used wisely and the student put in no additional effort.
Texture and Design
1 pts

Best 21-25 pts

The whistle clearly has two different textures, which completes the overall look of the form.
Good 16-20 pts

The whistle clearly two different textures that could have been better thought out, but it does not cause too much distraction.
Fair 11- 15 pts

The whistle has only one or maybe two textures, which could have been thought out better to complete the form. The textures may be distracting.
Poor 10 or less pts

The whistle does not have texture and the form is not complete.
Functioning Whistle- 3 extra pts
1 pts

Best 21-25 pts

The whistle functions clearly.
Good 16-20 pts

The whistle functions but not as clearly as possible.
Fair 11- 15 pts

The whistle makes little sound.
Poor 10 or less pts

The whistle makes not sound.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98