iRubric: 2-D Design Portfolio Concentration rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

2-D Design Portfolio Concentration

2-D Design Portfolio Breadth

2-d AP portfolio

Rubric Code: UA354X

By dcervantes

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Scoring Descriptors
	excellent 6 pts	Strong 5 pts	Good 4 pts	moderate 3 pts	weak 2 pts	poor 1 pts
a Integration of the Topic of the Concentration and the Work Presented	excellent The concentration topic and the work presented are unmistakably and coherently integrated.	Strong The concentration topic is successfully integrated with most of the work presented	Good The concentration topic and the work presented are closely related.	moderate The connection between the concentration topic and the work is evident but erratic	weak There is a sense of a concentration, but integration of the topic and the work is inadequately considered	poor There is very little or no evidence of a concentration topic in the work presented, or there is not enough work to represent a concentration
b Decision Making and Discovery Through Investigation	excellent The investigation of the concentration topic provides convincing evidence of informed decision making and discovery.	Strong The investigation of the concentration topic provides evidence of thoughtful decision making and of discovery in many works	Good Some clear decision making and discovery are evident in the investigation of the concentration	moderate Decision making is sporadic, and the work demonstrates little sense of investigation or discovery.	weak Decision making is lacking; the work appears inadequately thought out and insufficiently explored	poor There is little or no evidence of decision making or investigation
c Originality and Innovative Thinking	excellent The concentration clearly demonstrates an original vision and innovative ideas and/or risktaking.	Strong The work for the concentration generally demonstrates original and innovative ideas.	Good The concentration demonstrates some originality, and the work shows some innovative thinking	moderate An idea for a concentration is presented, and some original ideas or attempts at innovation with materials and techniques seem to be emerging.	weak An idea for a concentration is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely mostly on appropriation.	poor An idea for a concentration may be present, but the work comprises trite, simplistic, or appropriated solutions that are poorly executed.
d Evocative Theme and Engagement of the Viewer	excellent An evocative, engaging theme is sustained through most of the work within the concentration.	Strong An evocative, engaging concentration theme is clearly present in much of the work.	Good A clear theme that engages the viewer with some of the work is discernible	moderate A potentially engaging theme is somewhat discernible but is inadequately considered.	weak A potentially engaging theme is present but is largely unsuccessful.	poor A theme that could engage the viewer with the work is absent
e Understanding and Application of 2-D Design Principles	excellent The work shows a thorough understanding and effective application of 2-D design principles	Strong Overall the work shows understanding and effective application of design principles; there may be some less successful pieces.	Good The work is inconsistent in quality, but overall the understanding and application of design principles is good.	moderate Some development is evident, but only a moderate understanding and superficial application of design principles are demonstrated	weak A concentration is evident, but the work shows a weak understanding or random application of design principles.	poor The work shows very little or no understanding of design principles and their application
f Growth and Transformation	excellent In general the work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.	Strong The work is technically strong; materials and media are used well to express ideas	Good The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects and articulation of ideas do not always work together	moderate Though uneven, the work demonstrates emerging technical competence and some knowledgeable use of materials and media	weak Overall the work demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials and media	poor The work shows very little technical competence; it is naïve and lacks skill.
g Technical Competency and Skill with Materials and Media	excellent The work conveys a sense of transformation, and most works demonstrate a distinct measure of success.	Strong The work generally exhibits transformation, and many works demonstrate a measure of success	Good Apparent transformation is noticeable, but the scope of the work is limited or repetitive	moderate Some transformation is discernible, but the scope of the work is narrow, repetitive, or both	weak The work is mostly repetitive; only a few pieces suggest growth or show slight signs of transformation	poor Overall the work shows no indication of growth or transformation.
h Appropriation and the Student “Voice”	excellent Any apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference that is transformed in the service of a larger, personal vision in which the student’s “voice” is prominent.	Strong Any apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists shows a strong sense of the student’s “voice” and individual transformation of the images	Good With the apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists, the student’s “voice” is discernible; the images have been manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas	moderate If published or photographic sources or the work of other artists are appropriated, the work appears to be nearly direct reproductions; even if the work is skillfully rendered, the student’s “voice” and the individual transformation of the images are minimal.	weak The works appear to be direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists; there is little discernible student “voice” or individual transformation	poor The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists; there is no discernible student “voice” or individual transformation
I Image Quality (for Weak and Poor Concentration Only)	excellent	Strong	Good	moderate	weak The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted	poor The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.
J Overall Accomplishment and Quality	excellent Accomplishment among the works may vary, but overall the work reaches a level of excellent quality.	Strong There may be varying levels of accomplishment among the works, but overall the work is of strong quality	Good There may be uneven levels of accomplishment among the works for the concentration, but overall the work is of good quality.	moderate There may be an emerging level of accomplishment among the works for the concentration, and overall the work is of moderate quality.	weak Little evidence of accomplishment is demonstrated; overall the work is of weak quality	poor Overall the works for the concentration lack accomplishment and are of poor quality

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Discuss this rubric