Skip to main content

iRubric: 4 C'S RUBRIC

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
4 C'S RUBRIC 
Rubric Code: U82X57
By ryankri
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric THE 4 C'S
  Strong Quality

5 pts

Good Quality

4 pts

Moderate Quality

3 pts

Weak Quality

2 pts

Poor Quality

1 pts

Content

Strong Quality

The work contains all the requirements for the assignment and has a strong, clear message.
Good Quality

The work contains almost all requirements for the assignment but the message may not be completely clear.
Moderate Quality

The work contains about half of the requirements and the message is not completely clear.
Weak Quality

The work contains one or two of the requirements. The message is unclear.
Poor Quality

The work contains no requirements. There is no or little effort put into the work.
Creativity/Originality

Strong Quality

Work shows strong evidence of ones own thinking.
Good Quality

Work has some purpose/direction.<BR>
Some manipulation of ideas is evident.
Moderate Quality

Half of the work shows some evidence of one's own thinking.
Weak Quality

The sense of exploration of the medium is missing. There is at least some sense of artistic decision-making.
Poor Quality

There is little, if any, evidence of thinking.
Craftsmanship/Skill/Consistency

Strong Quality

Work shows strong craftsmanship qualities.<BR>
If there are apparent photographic or published sources, there is also a strong sense of individual transformation.
Good Quality

Work shows sense of real effort. <BR>
In general, the work demonstrates some degree of success. <BR>
If there are apparent photographic or published sources, the student's individual "voice" can be discerned.
Moderate Quality

Technique is erractic, with little or no sense of challenge. <BR>
Work may show a sense of real effort, but problems are not successfully resolved. <BR>
If there are apparent photographic or published sources, the work appears to be nearly direct reproduction; the student's "voice" is weak.
Weak Quality

Solutions to problems tend to be more simplistic. <BR>
Attempts to deal with ideas or technical problems are not realized.
Poor Quality

Technique is poor.<BR>
Solutions tend to be trite.
Cooperation

Strong Quality

Class time was used wisely. <BR>
Much time and effort went into the planning and design of project.
Good Quality

Class time was used wisely. <BR>
Student could have put in more time and effort into the project during class.
Moderate Quality

Some of the class time was used wisely but a portion of that class time the student was not on task.
Weak Quality

Class time was not always used wisely, but student was not off task all class.
Poor Quality

Class time was not used wisely and the student put in no additional effort.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224