Skip to main content

iRubric: CE 8 Creation/Evolution Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CE 8 Creation/Evolution Rubric 
Rubric Code: U67X9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Creation/Evolution Rubric
  Poor

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Quality of Project

Poor

Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not show the theory of the process chosen.
Fair

Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear although some parts of the theory were missed or reported wrong
Good

Project was extremely organized. Information presented was clear and interesting and most parts were correct and accurate
Excellent

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully explained all the parts of the theory and facts were all accurate.
Group Paper

Poor

Paper did not explain what the theory involves or any people associated with the theory. Project did not have a compare and contrast section included, or if it did it was incomplete and inaccurate.
Fair

Paper had mistakes in what the theory involved and the people associated with the theory. Compare and contrast section was included although there were some parts that were inaccurate or missing.
Good

Paper explained the theory fairly well, although there were a few minor mistakes made. People included were correct. Compare and contrast section was fairly well done. Both sections were present and fairly accurately presented
Excellent

Paper was very well done. The theory that was presented was explained clearly and people involved with the theory were given proper credit.Compare and contrast section was very well done. Both sections were very well explained and presented in a such a way that understanding was very easy.
Individual Paper

Poor

Paper was incomplete, or did not show how personal beliefs were backed up with fact.
Fair

Paper contained a few mistakes in the facts used to back up the beliefs. But beliefs presented were fairly well backed.
Good

Paper contained minimal mistakes in the facts used to back up the beliefs. Beliefs were presented in a clear way and were clearly backed up with facts.
Excellent

Paper contained no mistakes in facts used to back up beliefs. Beliefs were presented in a clear and consise manner and all beliefs presented were backed up well.
Presentation

Poor

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the teacher.
Fair

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were able to answer some questions when asked by teacher or other students.
Good

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice was used when speaking. Visual aspects of project was organized and easy to read.Group members were able to answer most questions posed by teacher and other students.
Excellent

Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were excellent. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the teacher.
Sources of Information & Citation

Poor

Information used and presented was not cited properly or at all. Evidence of plagarism is apparent. Only one source of information was used.
Fair

Information used and presented was cited but not in proper format. No evidence of plagarism is apparent. Only 2 sources of information were used.
Good

Information used and presented was cited in proper format with minimal errors. Information presented was not plagarized and there are instances of authors' own insights. 3 sources of information were used.
Excellent

Information used and presented was cited in proper format with no errors. Information presented was not plagarized and shows authors' own insights clearly. 4+ sources of information were used.
Group work

Poor

Did not use time efficiently. Was constantly off task and did not provide any help with any or all parts of the project.
Fair

Needed a few reminders from other members of the group to stay on task. Offered some insights to the project and provided the group with some helping some of the areas that the project was assessed. Was able to work with other members of the group with minimal problems.
Good

Needed minimal reminders from other members of the group to stay on task. Offered many insights to the project and provided the group with help in many of the areas that the project was assessed. Was able to work with other members of the group well.
Excellent

Was always on task and took a leadership role in organizing time and group work efficiently. Offered many insights to the project and provided the group with help in all of the areas of the project that was assessed. Was able to work with other members of the group with no problems.
Peer Assessment

Poor

All peer assessments were incomplete or done in a way that was patronizing and disrespectful to peers.
Fair

Most peer assessments were completed but lacked insight into reasons behind the marks that were given. Wording used was respectful of peers. Did not offer insights to ways peer presentations could have been improved.
Good

All peer assessments were finished and showed reasoning behind the marks that were given. Wording used was respectful of peers. Offered some constructive insights as to ways peer presentations could have been improved.
Excellent

All peer assessments were finished and showed insight and reasoning behind the marks that were given. Wording used was respectful of peers. Offered many constructive insights as to ways that peer presentations could have been improved.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243