Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Super Maneuverability Technical Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Super Maneuverability Technical Paper
APA Formatted
Rubric Code:
TX9CBA5
By
christymckinzie
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Super Maneuverability Paper
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Format
Poor
● Headers and margin mostly correct
● Page numbers
● Text double spaced
● Past tense/third person
● Three to five pages
Fair
APA format
● Headers and margin correct
● Page numbers
● Proper subheadings
● Text double spaced
● ● Three to five pages
● Proper grammar and mechanics
Headings
Good
APA format
● Headers and margin mostly correct
● Page numbers in top right corner
● Proper subheadings
● Text double spaced
● Past tense/third person
● Three to five pages
● Proper grammar and mechanics
(mostly collegiate level)
Level 1 headings Introduction, Research, Methods, Results & Conclusion
Excellent
APA format
● Running header ½” from top of page
● Title 1” from top of page
● 1”margin on each side, 0.5” gutter on left
● Page numbers in top right corner
● Proper subheadings
● Text double spaced
● Past tense/third person
● Three to five pages
● Proper grammar and mechanics
(collegiate level)
Level 1 headings Introduction, Research, Methods, Results & Conclusion
Introduction
Poor
●Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
Fair
Heading
● Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
●Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
Good
Heading
● Purpose of the study
● Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
●Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
● Limitations by which the project will be
confined
Excellent
Level 1 Heading
● Purpose of the study; include value and
contribution of the study
● Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
●Clear, specific hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
● Limitations by which the project will be
confined
Research
Poor
● Includes a minimum of 1 peer-reviewed,
scholarly articles/journals
● Organized
Fair
Review of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
● Includes a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed,
scholarly articles/journals
● Organized
Good
Analysis and synthesis of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
● Includes a minimum of 4 peer-reviewed,
scholarly articles/journals
● Organized from general information to
specific:
Excellent
Analysis and synthesis of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
● Includes a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed,
scholarly articles/journals
● Organized from general information to
specific:
Methods - Materials
Poor
Instrumentation
● Numbered list
●at least 1 part that control maneuverability with specific explanations
●at least 1 part that control stability with specific explanations
●at least 1 part that are used to control the aircraft with specific explanations
Fair
Instrumentation
● Numbered list
●at least 2 parts that control maneuverability with specific explanations
●at least 2 parts that control stability with specific explanations
●at least 2 parts that are used to control the aircraft with specific explanations
Good
Instrumentation
● Complete numbered list of specific make and model
●at least 3 parts that control maneuverability with specific explanations
●at least 3 parts that control stability with specific explanations
●at least 3 parts that are used to control the aircraft with specific explanations
Excellent
Instrumentation
● Complete numbered list of specific make and model
● Instrument tolerance and range
●at least 3 parts that control maneuverability with specific explanations
●at least 3 parts that control stability with specific explanations
●at least 3 parts that are used to control the aircraft with specific explanations
Methods - Procedures
Poor
Procedures
● Numbered list of all procedures
Fair
Procedures
● Describe preliminary study if used
● Numbered list of all procedures
● Deviations from procedures explained
Good
Procedures
● Site location or description of the study
● Describe preliminary study if used
● Numbered list of all procedures
● Deviations from procedures explained
and justified
Excellent
Procedures
● Site location and description of the study
● Describe preliminary study if used
● Complete numbered list of all procedures
● All deviations from procedures explained
and justified
Methods - Solution Selection
Poor
Solutions Selection
● Rationale for final design
Fair
Solutions Selection
● Rationale for final design with some explanation.
Good
Solutions Selection
● Rationale for final design selection that includes justification based on
attributes and drawbacks
Excellent
Solutions Selection
● Rationale for final design selection that includes justification based on attributes and drawbacks
Results
Poor
Visual representation of designs
● Evidence of completed diagram
Fair
Visual representation of designs
● Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
● Comments of design outcomes
include modifications in design
Good
Visual representation of designs
● Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
● Comments and observations of design outcomes
include modifications in design
● Some rationale for any program modification from original design
Excellent
Visual representation of designs
● Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
● Comments and observations of design outcomes
Cite major modifications in design
● Rationale for any program
modification from original design
Conclusion
Poor
Summarize includes at least 2 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
● What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
● Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
● What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
● Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
● Future research based on findings
Fair
Summarize includes at least 3 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
● What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
● Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
● What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
● Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
● Future research based on findings
Good
Summarize includes at least 5 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
● What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
● Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
● What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
● Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
● Future research based on findings
Excellent
Summarize
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
● What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
● Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
● What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
● Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
● Future research based on findings
In-Text Citations and References
Poor
Minimum of 2 peer-reviewed
(online/print), scholarly
articles/journals should be references
● No more than three websites for the
entire research paper
● some in-text citations that are somewhat correct
● Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
● References on separate page at the end
Fair
Minimum of 3 peer-reviewed
(online/print), scholarly
articles/journals should be references
● No more than three websites for the
entire research paper
● Citation for some references
● Some references have an in-text citation
● Citation format somewhat correct
●Each reference is reputable and appropriate
● Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
● References on separate page at the end
Good
Minimum of 4 peer-reviewed
(online/print), scholarly
articles/journals should be references
● No more than three websites for the
entire research paper
● Citation for each reference
● Most references have an in-text citation
● Citation format mostly correct
● Citation appropriate and related to the research
● Each reference is reputable and appropriate
● Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
Excellent
Minimum of 5 peer-reviewed
(online/print), scholarly
articles/journals should be references
● No more than three websites for the
entire research paper
● Citation for each reference
● Each reference has an in-text citation
● Citation format correct
● Citation appropriate and related to the research
● Each reference is reputable and appropriate
● Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
● Refere
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.