iRubric: Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Analysis

This is the rubric for grading the Analysis section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by TV, v2.0, revised 03/12 by TW, v 3.0 revised 05/12 by department)

Rubric Code: T94B22

By dvknec

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts
Identification of Applicable Theory	Exemplary/Excellent Identifies appropriate governing law(s) or mathematical principle(s) that apply to a technical objective and justifies the selection of the method used.	Accomplished/Good Identifies the applicable governing scientific law(s) and mathematical principle(s) but does not explicitly explain the choice.	Developing/Fair Recognizes the branches of math or science pertinent to a technical objective but does not choose the best method. Does not identify the principle being used.	Deficient/Poor Chooses scientific and/or mathematical approaches that are not appropriate for the technical objectives (does things the wrong way)
Development of Analysis Model	Exemplary/Excellent Made appropriate assumptions (approximations) and justified them.	Accomplished/Good Made appropriate assumptions (approximations) but did not justify the selections.	Developing/Fair Made some inappropriate assumptions or unjustifiable approximations.	Deficient/Poor Made significant errors in their assumptions resulting in a flawed model.
Identification Variation	Exemplary/Excellent Sources of variation are identified and their impact on results is calculated.	Accomplished/Good Sources of variation are identified but their impact on the results is only qualitatively assessed.	Developing/Fair Identification of sources of variation and the assessment of their impact on results is attempted but incomplete.	Deficient/Poor Little or incorrect identification of sources of variation.
Assessing the Solution Assessing the reasonableness of the solution.	Exemplary/Excellent Calculated results are favorably compared to reasonably estimated values.	Accomplished/Good Results are reasonable but no rationale is given for their reasonableness.	Developing/Fair Unreasonable results are rationalized.	Deficient/Poor Obviously incorrect results are declared to be reasonable without explanation.
Interpretation of Results Interpretation of Results Appropriately Influences the Direction of the Project	Exemplary/Excellent Interprets and applies results in view of the technical objective of the analysis.	Accomplished/Good Draws an appropriate conclusion from results but does not support the conclusion.	Developing/Fair Uses results to support an inappropriate conclusion.	Deficient/Poor Draws inappropriate conclusions without support from results.

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric