iRubric: Group Habit Tracking Project Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Habit Tracking Project Rubric

This rubric is used to evaluate student performance on the collaborative group habit tracking assignment. It measures teamwork, completeness and accuracy of data, use of charts and graphs, interpretation of patterns, and quality of final conclusions.

Rubric Code: T2525AC

By LeaBrandhorst

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Group participation	Poor Little to no evidence of collaboration; project appears to have been completed by one person or lacks collective effort.	Fair One or two group members completed most of the work while others participated minimally.	Good Most group members contributed actively, although a few may have participated more than others.	Excellent All group members contributed equally and actively throughout the project, demonstrating collaborative engagement and shared responsibility.
Data completion	Poor Data is largely missing, inconsistent, or incomplete, compromising the validity of the project.	Fair Several entries are missing or incomplete, reducing the reliability of the collected data.	Good Most data entries are complete with only minor omissions.	Excellent All required data entries are complete and recorded for each day by all group members, showing thoroughness and consistency.
Data accuracy	Poor Many entries are unrealistic or unreliable, indicating careless or dishonest reporting.	Fair Multiple entries appear unclear or potentially inaccurate, raising questions about data reliability.	Good Data appears mostly accurate, with only minor inconsistencies or questionable entries.	Excellent Recorded data appears accurate, realistic, and consistent with students’ prior responses and reported habits.
Data Organization & Structure	Poor The data is presented in a disorganized or unclear way. Poor structure, missing labels, or messy formatting make it hard to understand what the table represents.	Fair The table contains the necessary data, but the structure is inconsistent or confusing. Misaligned cells, unclear labels, or uneven formatting make interpretation more difficult.	Good The data table is mostly organized and understandable, with only minor formatting or structural issues that slightly affect readability.	Excellent The group organized the data in a clear, consistent, and well-structured table. Columns and rows are aligned, labels are correct, and the overall structure makes the information easy to read and interpret.