iRubric: Science Fair - Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Science Fair - Oral Presentation

Rubric Code: T24CW77

By Mcruzandi

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Chemistry

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

SCIENCE FAIR PROJECT ORAL PRESENTATION Evaluation of science research presentation (slides and oral.)
	0.0 0 0 pts	1.0 * 1 pts	2.0 2 pts**	(N/A)	4.0 ** 4 pts**
Project Introduction Students should introduce themselves, explain the title of project, purpose, and why you chose the topic.	0.0 3 or all 4 parts of introduction are missing.	1.0 2 parts of introduction are missing.	2.0 1 part of introduction missing (Either name, project title, purpose, and reason for topic selection).	N/A	4.0 All parts of introduction present.
Background Research Student should present a brief background on the significance of the project and the current research related to the topic.	0.0 No background research given at all.	1.0 Background research not relevant to project, no explanation.	2.0 Little background research or significance of project given, no explanation given.	N/A	4.0 Background research and significance of project fully explained clearly.
Question, Hypothesis and Variables Student should restate the question, state the hypothesis, and explain their variables	0.0 No question, variables, or hypothesis stated at all.	1.0 No variables, unclear hypothesis, question not restated.	2.0 Either project question or hypothesis not clearly explained, or not all variables stated or described.	N/A Project question is restated, hypothesis explained, variables listed but not described.	4.0 Project question is clearly restated, hypthesis explained, and variables are completely described.
Experimental Procedure Student should summarize the experimental procedures, using any pictures from their board to clarify and explain.	0.0	1.0	2.0 Experimental procedures mentioned, but not described step by step., some steps may be unclear.	N/A Experimental procedures described	4.0 Experimental procedures clearly described, and pictures/diagrams on board used to help clarify. (if relevant)
Presentation of Results Student should use data - charts, graphs, pictures, diagrams and discussion to explain the results of their experiment.	0.0 No data tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, pictures are present, no results are explained	1.0 Data tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, pictures are present, but not explained. Results are unclear to audience.	2.0 Data tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, pictures present, but not clearly explained or understood by audience, when results are presented.	N/A Data tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, pictures, are explained. Results are presented.	4.0 Data tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, pictures are clearly and thoroughly explained. Results are clearly presented.
Conclusions Student should explain whether the results support or refute the hypothesis (and why) and explain their conclusions.	0.0 No mention of either hypothesis or conclusion.	1.0 Hypothesis not mentioned and no conclusions reached	2.0 Surface level conclusions reached but no mention of original hypothesis	N/A Hypothesis supported or refuted and conclusions are thoughtful	4.0 Hypothesis supported or refuted and conclusions demonstrate deep understanding of the project.
Professionalism The presentation should be given in a professional manner and be of high quality. DO NOT FORGET TO THANK THE JUDGES FOR THEIR TIME AND ASK IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS!!!	0.0 The presenter does not demonstrate any profesionalism, importance, or seriousness to the presentation nor the project itself.	1.0 Presenter is not organized, does not speak loudly or clearly, avoids eye contact, or exhibits distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	2.0 Presenter is fairly well prepared, speaks loudly or clearly but could use more practice, maintains some eye contact, and avoids some distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	N/A Presenter is well prepared, speaks loudly and clearly, generally maintains eye contact, and avoids most distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	4.0 Presenter is well prepared, speaks loudly and clearly, maintains eye contact with the audience, and avoids all distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc
Knowledge The student must shown complete dominance of the topic.	0.0 The presenter shows no knowledge of the topic. Is unable to answer questions nor can provide any concrete information about the project.	1.0 Presenter provides just a basic information about the project and cannot elaborate on the experimental procedure nor analysis or conclusion about the topic.	2.0 Presenter provides a general information about the project. The discussion, elaboration of the poject is just general and cannot provide a deep discussion or elaborated answers to questions.	N/A Presenter demonstrate a deeper knowledge about the topic showing that was involve in the process and development of the project. Can discuss all main parts of the project at his/her level including questions.	4.0 Presenter demonstrate a full and deep knowlege about the project and topic. Demonstrate that was involved in all process of it by providing a thorough discussion and very deep analysis of the results including questions.
Presentation Quality The slides presentation complies with neatness, organization, and any forms of mistakes.	0.0 No slides presentation provided or a very poor presentation that lacks material requested, organization, neatness, and includes multiple grammar mistakes.	1.0 The slides presentation is missing most parts requested. It is not quite polished, lacks organization, and include some grammar mistakes as well as data mistakes (e.g: units, table and chart's format, etc.)	2.0 The slide presentation includes the main information requested. Seems polished and organized, but includes some grammar and data mistakes (e.g: units, table and chart's format, etc.)	N/A Slides presentation with good format, includes the information requested, seems neat, organized, and polished. Includes most correct format.	4.0 Slides presentation shows to have been developed with extreme care. Very organized, neat, and polished and does not include any errors in any of the formats and information provided.

Keywords:

Science Fair, Oral Report

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric