iRubric: Artist Power Point/ Google Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Artist Power Point/ Google Presentation

Students will research a famous artist and do a power point /google presentation about the artist showing an image of the artist and at least one image of that artists artwork. Feldman's Four Step to Art Criticism will be written and applied to one of the artists image to be included in the presentation

Rubric Code: SX4A783

By JSPiper

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Artist Anyone?
	Distinguished 10 pts	Proficient 8 pts	Average 6 pts	Attempted 3 pts	Not Attempted 0 pts
Content 1st artist	Distinguished Students confidently used artistic terms to discuss the elements, composition, techniques, and content to the artist’s work in detail. Extensive research on artist evident. Student uses bullets and expands on info using their own words.	Proficient Students attempted to use artistic terms to discuss the elements, composition, techniques, and content to the artist’s work in detail. Research on artist is shown.Student uses bullets and expands on info using their own words.	Average Student did not use artistic terms to explain displayed artworks. Some research on artist is shown. Student uses bullets and expands on info using their own words.	Attempted Student displayed artworks but did not talk about them. Little research on artist is shown. Student reads from paragraphed slides.	Not Attempted Student did not show or talk about any artworks from this artist.
Content 2nd artist	Distinguished Students confidently used artistic terms to discuss the elements, composition, techniques, and content to the artist’s work in detail. Extensive research on artist evident. Student constructs each slide through their own words	Proficient Students attempted to use artistic terms to discuss the elements, composition, techniques, and content to the artist’s work in detail. Research on artist is shown.Alot of biography information is shown	Average Student did not use artistic terms to explain displayed artworks. Some research on artist is shown. Some biography information is shown	Attempted Student displayed artworks but did not talk about them. Little research on artist is shown. Few biography information is shown	Not Attempted Student did not show or talk about any artworks from this artist.
Comparison	Distinguished Student displays the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student speaks fluently as though they understand the similarities and have studied and prepared.	Proficient Student displays the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student struggles to address the similarities of the two artists.	Average Student does not display the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student struggles to address the similarities of the two artists.	Attempted Student does not display the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student sounds very unconfident of the similarities of the two artists as though they are ill-prepared.	Not Attempted Student does not bother to compare the two artists.
Contrast	Distinguished Student displays the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student speaks fluently as though they understand the similarities and have studied and prepared.	Proficient Student displays the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student struggles to address the similarities of the two artists.	Average Student does not display the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student struggles to address the similarities of the two artists.	Attempted display the two artists work side by side as they explain the similarities between the work of the two artists. Student sounds very unconfident of the similarities of the two artists as though they are ill-prepared.	Not Attempted Student does not bother to compare the two artists.
Organization	Distinguished Project does show extensive organization. It is clear and is in cronological order. Has more than 20 slides labeled with Titles and dates.	Proficient Project does show acceptable organization. It is unclear of chronological order. Has more than 17 slides labeled with Titles and dates.	Average Project does show organization. It is clear and is in chronological order. Has 12 slides labeled with Titles and dates.	Attempted Project does show some organization.But It is unclear and is not in chronological order. Has less than 5 slides unlabeled.	Not Attempted Student has less than 5 slides to show.
technical points	Distinguished No misspellings or grammatical or punctuation errors. Posted to Drund. Images are Quality, Not blurry. All Images are from the artist being presented on. Student does not read from slides but presents as if they know the information. correct pronunciation and good volume.	Proficient Has 1-2 misspellings and only one grammatical error and one punctuation.Posted to Drund. 1-2 Images are low-quality/blurry. All Images are from the artist being presented on. Student reads from slides. correct pronunciation and good volume.	Average Has 1-2 grammatical errors with some misspellings and punctuation errors.Posted to Drund. 3-5 Images are low-quality/blurry. All Images are from the artist being presented on. Student reads from slides. correct pronunciation and good volume.	Attempted Has more than 3 grammatical and/or spelling and punctuation errors. Not Posted to Drund. 3-5 Images are low-quality/blurry. Some images are not from the artist being presented on. Student reads from slides, has poor pronunciation and poor volume.	Not Attempted Presentation appears to be last minute attempt for some points.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Discuss this rubric