iRubric: Evaluation Rubric for Chinese Ming Vases

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evaluation Rubric for Chinese Ming Vases

Rubric Code: SAX4B3

By juniperp

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: K-5

Evaluation Rubric for Ming Vases Grade is evaluated on the criteria listed below, by circling the appropriate rating.
	Outstanding Quality well above that expected: truly noteworthy work! 4 pts	Very Good Quality better than expected of a student in 3rd grade 3 pts	Satisfactory Quality as expected; competent work, conveying confidence in the students understanding. 2 pts	Weak Quality lower than expected, due to lack of understanding. 1 pts	Inadequate Missing or lack of quality, of concern. 0 pts
Creativity The design of the artwork shows original work. Student applied elements and principles of design using lines, patterns, shape, and movement through out the piece.	Outstanding 4 Beyond original design, including all elements and principles of design and well as several others	Very Good 3 Original design, includes all elements and principles of design required	Satisfactory 2 Original design, including most elements and principles of design, lines, patterns, shapes, and movement	Weak 1 Not original piece, and missing some lines, patterns and shapes	Inadequate 0 Piece not original, no noticeable lines, patterns, or shapes
Composition Student completed design, using proper techniques, thick and thin lines, equal white to blue color through out, one large picture design using at least 1 of 4 permitted designs, and bands of lines and shapes to separate vase sections.	Outstanding 4 All and more design elements are achieved	Very Good 3 All design elements are achieved	Satisfactory 2 Missing only 1 design element	Weak 1 Several design elements are missing from piece	Inadequate 0 no noticeable design elements are on the artwork
Effort The project was continued until completed. Showes much thought. Shows skill of application. Student worked hard with much effort put forth.	Outstanding 4 Outstanding effort, student worked extremely hard, during the making of this artwork	Very Good 3 Great effort and ability	Satisfactory 2 Good effort and ability	Weak 1 Very little effort was seen during the making of this artwork	Inadequate 0 No effort was put forth on the making of this artwork
Cooperation The student worked well with students in class, performed enthusiastically, assisted in clean-up, and preparation.	Outstanding 4 Outstanding participation and enthusiasm	Very Good 3 Great participation and enthusiasm	Satisfactory 2 Good participation and enthusiasm	Weak 1 Very little participation and enthusiasm	Inadequate 0 No participation and enthusiasm
Critique Used verbal skills to evaluate artwork. Showed interest in others art, and expressed original ideas.	Outstanding 4 Outstanding evaluating, showed lots of interest in everyones art, and had very original ideas	Very Good 3 Very good evaluating artwork, showed much interest in others artworks, and had original ideas	Satisfactory 2 Good evaluating artwork, expressed interest in others art, and had original ideas	Weak 1 Hard time evaluating art, somewhat interested in others art and no original ideas	Inadequate 0 Hard time evaluating art, no interest in others art and no original ideas
Craftsmanship the artwork was well constructed with neatness.	Outstanding 4 Extremely well constructed and very neat	Very Good 3 Very well constructed and neat	Satisfactory 2 Good craftsmanship	Weak 1 Very little neatness and craftsmanship	Inadequate 0 Artwork is lacking neatness and craftsmanship
Overall Score	Outstanding 24-20=4	Very Good 19-15=3	Satisfactory 14-11=2	Weak 10-6=1	Inadequate 6-0=0

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric