iRubric: Portfolio Management and Leadership Section - Fall 2012 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Portfolio Management and Leadership Section - Fall 2012

This is the rubric for grading the Management and Leadership section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v2.0, revised 03/12 by CE, v3.0, revised 08/12 by BR).

Rubric Code: S9W3WX

By mcengin

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title 33.33 %
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts	Not Applicable (N/A)
Setting / Context 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers.	Accomplished/Good References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved.	Developing/Fair References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.	Deficient/Poor Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project.	Not Applicable
Appearance 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Properly formatted word-processed document on “resume-quality” paper.	Accomplished/Good Properly formatted word-processed document.	Developing/Fair Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.	Deficient/Poor Illegible or sloppy.	Not Applicable
Writing Mechanics 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors.	Accomplished/Good Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.	Developing/Fair Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.	Deficient/Poor Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…	Not Applicable
Reflection 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Summary, mastery of the category, and personal growth represented by the entry.	Accomplished/Good Summary of the student’s contribution and an explanation of how the entry demonstrates the mastery of the category.	Developing/Fair Pure summary of the student’s contribution to entry.	Deficient/Poor Rambling gibberish. It appears the writer is trying to fill in empty space.	Not Applicable
Entry 66.67 %
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts	Not Applicable (N/A)
Attending/Planning/Running Meetings 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Meeting attendance records are documented. All team members present at all meetings and rare absences are excused in advance by the advisor. Meeting agendas are provided for each meeting and documented.	Accomplished/Good Meeting attendance records are documented. Occasional missed meetings by team members. Meeting agendas are alluded to but not clearly documented.	Developing/Fair Most members present at most meetings with some unexcused absences. Attendance records are spotty. Meetings are run well but not planned in advance with a written agenda.	Deficient/Poor Many members frequently miss meetings and do not inform the team. Little or no attendance documentation. Meetings are poorly run with no advance written agenda.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Defining Members’ Roles 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Roles and tasks are clearly assigned to every team member. These roles and tasks are documented and acknowledged by each team member.	Accomplished/Good Roles and tasks are assigned to each team member with occasional missed documentation. Team roles are informally assigned and not clearly documented.	Developing/Fair Roles and tasks are assigned informally with spotty documentation. Team roles are highly informal and are not documented by the team leader.	Deficient/Poor Poor documentation of roles and tasks. Member roles tend to vary from week to week and responsibilities are not delineated well.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Work Breakdown 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, results oriented, time based) tasks are agreed upon and documented. Weekly goals are assigned to team members with clear due dates and completion dates.	Accomplished/Good 4 or more SMART aspects met. Vagueness to goals and tasks makes it difficult to know when the goal is met. Assignments are documented with due dates	Developing/Fair 3 or more aspects met. Vagueness makes it very difficult to document the completion of the goal/task. Documentation is incomplete with missing entries.	Deficient/Poor Goals are not SMART and tasks are not clearly assigned with due dates. Documentation is highly incomplete or missing entirely.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Making Collective Decisions 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Clear procedures for making decisions are established and documented. Decisions, the process by which they were made, and the involvement of members are also documented in the meeting records. At least one example of the decision making process is recorded in detail in the narrative.	Accomplished/Good Decisions and the involvement of team members are documented in the meeting records. The decision making process is ad hoc and is not clearly established by the team. At least one example of the decision making process is recorded in the narrative.	Developing/Fair Decision-making procedures are established informally, leading to inconsistency in implementation and a failure to involve all members in decision making. Incomplete documentation of decisions. One example of the decision making process is recorded in the narrative but details are incomplete.	Deficient/Poor Little to no documentation of the decision making process. Involvement of team members in making decisions is unclear. An example of the decision making process is alluded to in the narrative but not well described.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Team Member Support / Mentoring 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Scores on the parts of the team survey that assess member support are excellent and team satisfaction is readily apparent. Student described in detail at least two examples of how s/he supported the team members in his/her narrative.	Accomplished/Good Scores on the parts of the team survey support are good and team satisfaction is readily apparent. Student described in detail one example of how s/he supported the team members in his/her narrative.	Developing/Fair Scores on the parts of the team survey support are fair and team satisfaction is apparent. Student described one example of how s/he supported the team members in his/her narrative but some details are lacking.	Deficient/Poor Scores on the parts of the team survey support are poor and team satisfaction is not apparent. Student mentioned one example of how s/he supported the team members in his/her narrative but the description is incomplete.	Not Applicable Not Applicable
Managing Conflict 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Student documented at least two instances of conflict and recorded exactly how the conflicts were resolved. Details of the conflict resolution were described thoroughly in the narrative.	Accomplished/Good Student documented one instance of conflict and recorded exactly how the conflict was resolved. Details of the conflict resolution were described thoroughly in the narrative.	Developing/Fair Student reported no conflicts over the course of the semester and no resolutions were documented. Reasons for this lack of conflict were described and considered in the narrative.	Deficient/Poor Student reported no conflicts over the semester and no resolutions were documented. No assessment on this lack of conflict was described in the narrative.	Not Applicable Not Applicable

Keywords:

IPC, Management and Leadership

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric