Skip to main content
iRubric: Event Management Presentation rubric

iRubric: Event Management Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Event Management Presentation 
Event Management Presentation
Assessment rubric for HOS 251 Event Management Student Project Presentation
Rubric Code: R2W54XA
By shannallappan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Event Management
  Excellent (10-9)

10 - 9

(N/A)

Very Good (8 - 6)

8 - 6

(N/A)

Average (5 - 3)

5 - 3

(N/A)

Poor (2 - 1)

2 - 1

(N/A)

Unacceptable (0)

0

(N/A)

Theme/ Preparation/ Research

Excellent (10-9)

Theme selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed
Very Good (8 - 6)

Theme selection, preparation, research were very evident
Average (5 - 3)

Topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standards
Poor (2 - 1)

Topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Proposal

Excellent (10-9)

Preparation was excellent and showed exacting detail and followed guidelines
Very Good (8 - 6)

Preparation was good and followed most guidelines
Average (5 - 3)

Preparation was average and followed some guidelines
Poor (2 - 1)

Appearance was not professional and presenter not poised. Preparation was incomplete and failed to closely follow guidelines
Unacceptable (0)

Complete miss. Either omitted or was completely incorrect.
Floor Plan Layout

Excellent (10-9)

Design and layout were excellently executed
Very Good (8 - 6)

Design and layout were well done but omitted some key elements(gift award tables, head tables, etc.)
Average (5 - 3)

Design and Layout were average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Design and Layout
were at beginning level of performance and lacking key elements of organization.
Unacceptable (0)

Complete miss. Either omitted or was completely incorrect.
Depth of Project / CriticalThinking

Excellent (10-9)

Depth of project and critical thinking were execellently demonstrated
Very Good (8 - 6)

Depth of project and critical thinking were very good
Average (5 - 3)

Depth of project and critical thinking were average and met standards
Poor (2 - 1)

Depth of project and critical thinking were at beginning level
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content

Excellent (10-9)

Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident
Very Good (8 - 6)

Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content
Average (5 - 3)

Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Knowledge and content at beginning level
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Presentation/ Delivery Style

Excellent (10-9)

Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture
Very Good (8 - 6)

Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good
Average (5 - 3)

Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts)

Excellent (10-9)

Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology
Very Good (8 - 6)

Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed
Average (5 - 3)

Creativity was average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Lacks creativity
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Organization/ Flow/ Time

Excellent (10-9)

Organizational skills were exceptional and the flow of the presentation and time execution were excellent
Very Good (8 - 6)

Organizational skills, flow of presentation and time utilization were very good
Average (5 - 3)

Presentation organization, flow, or time utilization were average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Presentation was poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations

Excellent (10-9)

Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were excellent and superbly executed
Very Good (8 - 6)

Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were greatly evident and very good
Average (5 - 3)

Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were average and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were at begining level
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Assignment Execution

Excellent (10-9)

Assignment execution was excellent
Very Good (8 - 6)

Assignemnt was very well executed
Average (5 - 3)

Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms
Poor (2 - 1)

Assignment performance was executed at beginning level
Unacceptable (0)

No assignment completed
Program for the Evening

Excellent (10-9)

Demonstrated interactive events, awards, drawings, supported by visual graphics.
Very Good (8 - 6)

Demonstrated interactive events, awards, drawings, but FAILED to be supported by visual graphics.
Average (5 - 3)

Very limited interactivity in the program.
Poor (2 - 1)

Practically no interactivity in program.
Unacceptable (0)

Complete miss!
Event Social Networking Media Promo

Excellent (10-9)

Social networking idea incorporated multiple ideas using social media to promote events. Web page was designed to conform to the lecture material 100%
Very Good (8 - 6)

Social networking idea incorporated multiple ideas using social media to promote events. Web page was designed to somewhat conform to the lecture material.
Average (5 - 3)

Social networking idea incorporated one or two ideas from guest lecture on using social media to promote events. Web page was designed to somewhat conform to the lecture material. Overall very average
Poor (2 - 1)

Social networking idea lacked depth, detail, and imagination. Failed to significantly incorporate materials from lecture.
Unacceptable (0)

Complete miss! Lack of detail, lack of imagination, failed entirely to match up with lecture material.
Press Release

Excellent (10-9)

Press release meets all guidelines
Very Good (8 - 6)

Press release meets guidelines but has 2 to 3 grammatical errors.
Average (5 - 3)

Press release fails to meet several guidelines and has 4 grammatical errors.
Poor (2 - 1)

Press release fails to meet several guidelines and has 5 grammatical errors
Unacceptable (0)

Press release fails to meet several guidelines and is very poor quality.
Smart objectives

Excellent (10-9)

5 objectives correctly stated with several objective levels covered
Very Good (8 - 6)
Average (5 - 3)
Poor (2 - 1)
Unacceptable (0)
Menu Selections

Excellent (10-9)

Price objectives achieved and clearly demonstrated. Menu is appetizing, varied, and easily transportable!
Very Good (8 - 6)

1 or more items lacking
Average (5 - 3)

2 or more items lacking
Poor (2 - 1)

3 or more items lacking
Unacceptable (0)

complete miss
Entertainment

Excellent (10-9)

Meets entertainment objectives and costs are well defined as are documents !
Very Good (8 - 6)

1 or more items lacking
Average (5 - 3)

2 or more items lacking
Poor (2 - 1)

3 or more items lacking
Unacceptable (0)

complete miss



Keywords:
  • Special Events, Event Management



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98