Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Oral Presentations - Spring 2015 rubric

iRubric: Oral Presentations - Spring 2015 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Oral Presentations - Spring 2015 Oral Presentations - Spring 2015 This is the rubric for grading oral presentations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v2.0, revised 03/12 by TV, v2.1, revised 09/12 by TV) Rubric Code: QXBX523 By dennisfanon Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Oral Presentations This is the rubric for grading oral presentations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department.
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts
Mechanics This section will be graded individually for each presenter in a team.
Appearance and voice 2 pts • Volume – loud enough • Clarity – good diction • Distractors – very few, if any, ums and ers • Good word choice • Good eye contact • Appropriately dressed	Exemplary/Excellent Meets all six points Student 1 ____ Student 2 ____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Accomplished/Good Lacks one of the points. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Developing/Fair Lacks two of the points. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Deficient/Poor Lacks more than two points. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____
Presentation 4 pts Did the presenter speak clearly (understandably)? Was it obvious the material had been rehearsed?	Exemplary/Excellent Presenter was very confident (demonstrated a sense that the presenter knew what they were doing) in delivery. Preparation very evident. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Accomplished/Good Presenter was occasionally confident with their presentation, however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been. Preparation was evident. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Developing/Fair Presenter was not consistent with the level of confidence and preparedness shown, but had some strong moments. Preparation was somewhat evident. Student 1 ____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Deficient/Poor Presenter appeared unconfident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____
Presentation 4 pts Was the presentation well organized and easy to follow?	Exemplary/Excellent Presentation well organized, well prepared, and easy to follow. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Accomplished/Good Presentation had organizing ideas, but there were a few gaps that made parts difficult to follow. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Developing/Fair Presentation had minimal signs of organization and was difficult to follow as a whole. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Deficient/Poor Presentation lacked organization. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____
Audience Awareness 3 pts Did the presenter engage the audience? Were they aware that they may be addressing people who may not be experts?	Exemplary/Excellent Presenter did an excellent job of engaging the audience and accurately explained technical jargon and project specific terms. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Accomplished/Good Presenter engaged the audience, but did not explain all necessary technical jargon and project specific terms. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Developing/Fair Presenter minimally engaged the audience and explained less than 50% of the technical jargon. Student 1 ____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Deficient/Poor Presenter failed to engage the audience (audience seemed unnecessary to the presentation) and did not explain technical jargon. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____
Visual presentation 3 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Slides clear and uncluttered with lettering large enough to be seen. Diagrams and photos clearly labeled. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Accomplished/Good Slides clear, but contain a few distracting transitions or unnecessary graphics. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Developing/Fair Slides too busy or lettering too small. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____	Deficient/Poor Poorly prepared slides which are hard to read and hard to follow. Student 1 _____ Student 2 _____ Student 3 _____ Student 4 _____
Content This section will be graded the same for all presenters in a team.
Unity 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Presentation contains a unifying and controlling purpose, thesis or claim that is organized and maintained throughout the presentation.	Accomplished/Good Unifying theme is apparent, but is not maintained consistently throughout the presentation	Developing/Fair Unifying theme is vague and minimally maintained throughout the presentation.	Deficient/Poor The unifying theme is not apparent.
The story: Purpose 3 pts What question are presenters exploring (purpose)? Why is this question important (reason)? Who could the results affect (clients - who/where)?	Exemplary/Excellent The purpose of the project is well defined and a compelling reason is given for it. Those who could benefit from the results are identified and those benefits are described.	Accomplished/Good The purpose of the project is defined, but the reason for completing the project is vague. Those who could benefit from the results are alluded to.	Developing/Fair Purpose is loosely defined and no reason is given for the importance of the project.	Deficient/Poor Purpose is not defined nor connected to application beyond the classroom.
The story: Method 3 pts How was this question or purpose explored (method)? Evidence / development – includes more specific, concrete evidence (or details) than opinion or abstract, general commentary	Exemplary/Excellent Shows how the question was explored (connection of project to question). Gives concrete, specific evidence and not just opinion, abstract or general commentary.	Accomplished/Good Shows how the question was explored. Evidence has some concrete aspects, but contains opinion and general commentary.	Developing/Fair Shows a weak connection to the question and method of exploration. Evidence has little concrete aspects and is mostly opinion.	Deficient/Poor Does not relate purpose to method.
The story: Outcome 2 pts What was the outcome (short results statement)?	Exemplary/Excellent Gives a concise results statement. Explains and develops appropriate, logical, and relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.	Accomplished/Good Gives a concise results statement. Some details and evidence are not pertinent to the topic, but there is some development of relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.	Developing/Fair Results statement is not apparent. Some supporting detail and evidence is shared, but is not organized in a way that will enable results to be apparent.	Deficient/Poor Presenters do not connect results with original question or purpose.
Collaboration This section will be graded the same for all presenters in a team.
Contribution 3 pts Did everyone contribute to the presentation? Did everyone seem well versed in the material?	Exemplary/Excellent Teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation.	Accomplished/Good Teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. Appeared that everyone did some work, but only some were carrying the presentation.	Developing/Fair Teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However, it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others.	Deficient/Poor Teammates never worked from others’ ideas. The presentation was carried by one person.
Use of teamwork 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Team members transitions organized and seamless	Accomplished/Good Team member transitions fairly organized	Developing/Fair Transitions somewhat disorganized	Deficient/Poor Some team members did not contribute

Keywords:

IPC, Oral Presentations

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16