iRubric: Vignette - Applying theoretical principles rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Vignette - Applying theoretical principles

Consider the given vignette, analyse the content and apply theoretical principles and concepts.

Rubric Code: Q7A936

By WeltecHealth

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Introduction 10 %	Poor Little direction is provided on what is in the body of the work. Introduction to subject unclear or absent.	Fair States purpose of assignment.	Good Gives some direction on how themes and concepts will be discussed.	Excellent Clearly outlines the topics to be discussed, the order in which information will be presented.
Body of essay 15 % Understanding of topic.	Poor Assignment is confused and underdeveloped showing little evidence of understanding themes and learning outcomes	Fair Understanding of topic and learning out comes not fully demonstrated	Good Demonstrates reasonable understanding of topics and learning outcomes	Excellent Demonstrates clear understanding of the topic and all learning outcomes
Body of essay 15 % Critical analysis.	Poor None or poor critical analysis of themes.	Fair Analysis and application of ideas is limited.	Good Demonstrates some reasonable analysis and application of ideas to the topic	Excellent Demonstrates thoughtful critical analysis and application of ideas to the topic.
Body of essay. 15 % Critical discussion and argument	Poor None or poor structured argument	Fair Level of argument around themes and ideas is limited or only sporadic throughout assignment.	Good Demonstrates some reasonable argument to essay themes	Excellent Demonstrates good well-structured argument throughout assignment.
Body of essay 20 % Supporting evidence	Poor None or little supporting evidence provided to qualify points of discussion	Fair Use of supporting evidence to topics is limited and/or is from unreliable sources.	Good Generally uses examples from course material or other literature to competently support arguments.	Excellent Applies good quality supporting evidence from several reputable sources to arguments throughout assignment
Conclusion 10 %	Poor Conclusion weak or absent.	Fair Conclusion omits some important points.	Good Conclusion is an adequate summary of your arguments.	Excellent Clear summary of arguments and a final position clearly indicated.
Referencing 10 % Citations and referencing are in APA format	Poor Citation and referencing is absent or APA system very poorly applied	Fair Little use of referenced material or APA system not always correctly applied.	Good Citations and referencing sometimes absent and /or APA formatting has some errors	Excellent APA format used correctly in both citations within the text and in the reference list
Formal aspects. 5 % Quality of writing.	Poor Grammar and spelling is poor and little evidence that work has been proof read by author. Expression and presentation of ideas unclear.	Fair A number of grammatical and spelling errors. Assignment generally weak in terms of unclear expression of ideas.	Good Spelling and grammar generally good with only occasional errors Some errors of expression or presentation but usually sound.	Excellent Correct spelling, punctuation and grammar. Clear legible professional presentation of assignment.

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric