Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Sport Management Debates rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Sport Management Debates
Sport Management Debates
Assessment rubric for graduate students' projects of class debates on current problems and issues in sport management
Rubric Code:
Q28C3A
By
kgjames
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Physical Ed., Fitness
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Sport Management Debates
Unacceptable
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Average
2 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Debate Topic/ Preparation/ Research
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Debate topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level of performance
Average
Debate topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Debate topic selection, preparation, research were very evident
Excellent
Debate topic selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed
Appearance/ Poise
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Appearance not professional and presenter not poised
Average
Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Appearance and poise were professional
Excellent
Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence
Introduction/ Purpose
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Introduction and purpose were at beginning level of performance
Average
Introduction and purpose were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Introduction and purpose were very well executed
Excellent
Introduction and purpose were excellently executed
Strategy/ Pt-Ctpoint/Crit. Thinking
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Debate strategy, point - counter-point format, critical thinking were at beginning level
Average
Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were average and met standard noms
Very Good
Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were very good
Excellent
Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were execellently demonstrated
Knowledge/ Content
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Knowledge and content at beginning level
Average
Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content
Excellent
Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident
Presentation/ Delivery Style
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation
Average
Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good
Excellent
Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Lacks creativity
Average
Creativity in debate was average and met standard norms
Very Good
Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed
Excellent
Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology
Organization/ Flow/ Time
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Debate and presentation were poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well
Average
Debate and presentation organization, flow, or time utilization were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Organizational skills, flow of debate and time utilization were very good
Excellent
Organizational skills were exceptional and the flow of the debate and time execution were excellent
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were at begining level
Average
Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were average and met standard norms
Very Good
Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were greatly evident and very good
Excellent
Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were excellent and superbly executed
Assignment Execution
Unacceptable
No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Poor
Assignment performance was executed at beginning level
Average
Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms
Very Good
Assignemnt was very well executed
Excellent
Assignment execution was excellent
Keywords:
Debate, sport managment, issues, problems, project
Subjects:
Physical Ed., Fitness
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Physical Ed., Fitness rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.