iRubric: Mock Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mock Interview

Assessment of mock interview process

Rubric Code: PX98XA7

By saraicedesigns

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Mock Interview Process
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Preparedness	Poor Student does not seem at all prepared to present. It was hard to tell what the topic was.	Fair The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. Stays on topic some (89%-75%) of the time.	Good Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. Stays on topic most (99-90%) of the time.	Excellent Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. Stays on topic all (100%) of the time.
Comprehension	Poor Student is unable to accurately answer questions posed by faculty about the job ad and their resume/portfolio.	Fair Student is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by faculty about the job ad and their resume/portfolio.	Good Student is able to accurately answer most questions posed by faculty about the job ad and their resume/portfolio.	Excellent Student is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by faculty about the job ad and their resume/portfolio.
Personal Presentation	Poor General attire not appropriate for presentation (jeans, t-shirt, shorts). Grooming is non existent. Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.	Fair Casual attire, but seemed somewhat wrinkled. Grooming needs work. Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.	Good Casual attire. Grooming is done, but is in need of some attention. Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.	Excellent Attire is appropriate for an interview or presentation, very professional look. Well groomed. Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Enthusiasm	Poor Very little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much interest in topic being presented.	Fair Facial expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but seem somewhat faked.	Good Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.	Excellent Facial expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Articulation	Poor Often mumbles or an not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word. Uses several (5 or more) words or phrases that are not appropriate for the interview. Rarely speaks in complete sentences.	Fair Speaks clearly and distinctly most (94%-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the interview. Sometimes (70%-80%) speaks in complete sentences.	Good Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100%-95%) of the time, but mispronounces one word. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the interview. Mostly (80%-98%) speaks in complete sentences.	Excellent Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100%-95%) of the time, and mispronounces no words. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the interview. Always (99%-100%) speaks in complete sentences.
Resume/Cover Letter
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Introduction/Conclusion	Poor Cover letter is missing a proper greeting and does not include job title or person's name who is applying for the job. No contact information, portfolio or references are available.	Fair Cover letter is missing two or more of the following: proper greeting, person's name, job title, address or pertinent contact information. Introduction is missing either the job title or the name of the person applying for the job. It is unclear how to contact the person applying for the job or their is no mention of a portfolio or references.	Good Cover letter contains a proper greeting, but is missing one of the following:person's name, job title, address or pertinent contact information. Introduction is missing either the job title or the name of the person applying for the job. The writer includes how to contact them and availability of a portfolio and references but some of the information is unclear.	Excellent Cover letter contains the proper greeting including person's name, job title, address and pertinent contact information. Introduction includes job title applying for as well as the person's name who is applying for the job. The writer includes how to contact them and the availability of a portfolio and references.
Sequencing of cover letter	Poor Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the letter is organized. There is no clear plan for the organization of information.	Fair Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader. Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional set or item of information seems out of place. The flow of information does not follow any particular order.	Good Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the letter less interesting. Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One set or item of information seems out of place. The flow of information is mostly set up to apply to the job title at the top of the resume.	Excellent Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. Information is organized in a clear, logical way. The flow of information is set up to apply to the job title at the top of the resume.
Grammar and Spelling	Poor Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.	Fair Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.	Good Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the letter is still easy to read.	Excellent Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the letter is exceptionally easy to read.
Content of Cover Letter	Poor The writer made no attempt to make the reader care about the person applying for the job. The reader is left with several questions.	Fair The writer attempts to make the reader care about the person applying for the job, but is not really successful. The reader is left with one or two questions listed in the ad unanswered. More information is needed to "fill in the blanks".	Good The writer successfully uses one or two reasons/appeals to try to show why the reader should care or want to know more about the person applying for the job. The ad's questions are anticipated and answered to some extent.	Excellent The writer successfully uses several reasons/appeals to try to show why the reader should care or want to know more about the person applying for the job. The ad's requirements are anticipated and answered thoroughly and completely.
Resume Fonts	Poor Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.	Fair Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.	Good Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.	Excellent Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
Based on this Interview
Would you hire this person?	Poor No	Fair	Good	Excellent Yes

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric