Skip to main content

iRubric: Shading Techniques of the Cone, Cylinder, Cube and Sphere rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Shading Techniques of the Cone, Cylinder, Cube and Sphere 
This is an assignment to teach the student the power of shading values, by drawing two dimensional shapes into three dimensional shaded forms. This assignment is assessed based on the student level 1, 2 or 3.
Rubric Code: PX3B57X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Shading Charcoal/Pencil Techniques
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Satisfactory for level

2 pts

Good for level

3 pts

Excellent for level

4 pts

Drawing 4 shapes

Needs Improvement

1. Soft dark lines in pencil
2. Draw 4 shapes: cube, sphere, cone and cylinder do not show accurate proportion
Satisfactory for level

1. Soft dark lines in pencil
2. Draw the 4 shapes: cube, sphere, cone and cylinder are proven to appear like the basic shapes but show inaccurate proportion
Good for level

1. Hard pencil
2. Draw the 4 shapes: cube, sphere cone and cylinder show good but not overall accurate proportion
Excellent for level

1. Hard pencil
2. Draw the 4 shapes: cone and cylinder are drawn with correct proportion
Pencil/Charcoal techniques

Needs Improvement

1. Grooves are etched into the paper
2. Shaded with less then 5 values
3. Pencil strokes do not follow the object shape
4. Pencil outline on the light side is not erased
5.Incorrect shadows
Satisfactory for level

1. Grooves are etched into the paper
2. Shaded with less then 5 values
3. Pencil strokes do not follow the object shape
4. Pencil outline at light source is not erased
5. Cast shadow is not the darkest value
Good for level

1. Soft pencil
2. Shade with 5 values
3. Strokes follow object
4. Erase pencil outline at
light source
5. Cast shadow is not the darkest value
Excellent for level

1. Soft pencil
2. Shade with 5 values
3. Pencil strokes follow the object
4. Erase pencil outline at
light source
3. Cast shadow is darkest value
Blending values

Needs Improvement

1. Messy blending
2. No or poor blending
3. Shapes appear flat
Satisfactory for level

1. Blending needs a great deal of improvement, shapes appear grainy and there is too much choppy gradations in value
2. Shapes appear flat
Good for level

1. Blending needs some improvement, shapes appear somewhat grainy with some choppy gradations in value
2. Shapes appear flat
Excellent for level

1. Blending tools used and value appears smooth with proper gradations in value
2. Shapes appear 3D
Cleaning up values

Needs Improvement

1. Shading appears outside of the shapes
2. Drawing appears messy and smudged
Satisfactory for level

1. Some shading appears outside of the shapes
2. Drawing appearance is somewhat messy
Good for level

1. Some shading appears outside of the shapes.
2. Drawing appearance is good
Excellent for level

1. Shapes are crisp and clean no outside pencil strokes
2. Drawing appearance is excellent
Participation/Use of class Time

Needs Improvement

Student did not use their time wisely & demonstrated much of their studio art time involved in other things unrelated to art.
Satisfactory for level

Student stayed on task some of the time but allowed distractions.
Good for level

Student was engaged in work most of the time, but allowed some distracting activities.
Excellent for level

Student was fully engaged in their art work without involving themselves other in distracting activities.
Composition

Needs Improvement

Student did not fill page with objects effectively
Satisfactory for level

Student attempted to fill the page with appropriately sized objects, but left some large spaces empty
Good for level

Student was able to fill the page with appropriately sized objects, but composition lacked flare
Excellent for level

Excellent choice of composition position, objects were well balanced and sized, and composition was interesting to the viewer
Artist Statement

Needs Improvement

Statement was not well developed. Had spelling, grammar & punctuation problems.
Satisfactory for level

Statement worked, but did not grab the reader's attention due to lack of detail
Good for level

Statement was fine, but did not show deep insight into the artist
Excellent for level

Excellent Artist Statement, had deep meaning & grabbed the reader's attention



Keywords:
  • Shading values, two dimensional, to three dimensional


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58