Skip to main content
iRubric: Graduate Engineering Presentation using Data rubric

iRubric: Graduate Engineering Presentation using Data rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Graduate Engineering Presentation using Data 
Graduate Engineering Presentation using Data
Rubric for presenting complex engineering concepts or processes using relavent data
Rubric Code: MXBX527
By dennisfanon
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Informational Team Report
Report on an engineering research topic
  Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Developing

2 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Exemplary

4 pts

Content

Informative and authoritative explanation of research topic
Defines background and importance of research
Unsatisfactory

States few main points and details that focus on the design project, or information does not relate to topic.
Developing

States most of the main points and details that focus on the design project. May include some unnecessary information.
Satisfactory

Adequately states the main points and details that are accurately focused on the design project.
Exemplary

Thoroughly and clearly states the main points and precise details that are accurately focused on the design project.
Organization

Information is presented in a clear and logical sequence.
Unsatisfactory

Minimal or no outline followed. No logical organization; some digressions. Unclear, confusing. No introduction or conclusion.
Developing

Fair evidence of a logical sequence of information. Some use of an outline. Weak introduction and conclusion.
Satisfactory

Adequate evidence of a logical sequence of information. Good use of an outline. Satisfactory introduction and conclusion.
Exemplary

Clearly organized into a logical sequence. <BR>
Excellent use of an outline. Excellent introduction and conclusion.
Delivery

Delivery is poised, clear, controlled, on-topic, and smooth.
Unsatisfactory

Little or no attempt is made to stay on the topic. Does not consider audience. Difficult to understand.
Developing

Delivers the information but does not stay on the topic. Little consideration of audience. Uses incomplete sentences.
Satisfactory

Adequately delivers the information while staying on the topic and considering the audience. Speaks clearly and confidently.
Exemplary

Effectively and creatively delivers the information while staying on the topic and considering the audience. Uses voice variation; Interesting and vivid to hear.
Preparation

Thorough preparation shown in presenters' complete knowledge and comfort level with material. Confident mastery of research topic.
Unsatisfactory

Presentation is lacking in preparation and in practice of the delivery including use of voice, posture, eye contact, gestures, pacing, and little or no use of pictures, graphs, computer models, etc. Difficult to hear. Appears tense. Fidgets often.
Developing

Presentation shows <BR>
some preparation as well as some practice in the delivery including marginal use of voice, posture, eye contact, gestures, pacing, and marginal use of pictures, graphs, computer models, etc.
Satisfactory

Presentation shows satisfactory preparation as well as practice in delivery including use of voice, posture, eye contact, gestures, and pacing. Some use of pictures, graphs, computer models etc.
Exemplary

Presentation shows detailed preparation and practice in delivery including use of voice, posture, eye contact, gestures, pacing, and use of pictures, graphs, computer models, etc. Interesting and vivid.
Use of Data

Data included is consistently relevant to the overall message/purpose.
Unsatisfactory

Little to no supporting data used. Linkage between data and main points is not evident. Appropriate use of labels and units of measure weak or not evident.
Developing

Fair evidence of logical linkage of data to main points and/or outline. Fair use of reasoning. Labels and units of measure in evidence, but not used properly.
Satisfactory

Adequate evidence of a logical linkage of data to main points and/or outline. Evidence of sufficient reasoning to support points. Appropriate use of labels and units of measure.
Exemplary

Clear and compelling use of data to support main points and conclusion. Excellent reasoning evident. Excellent use and presentation of data using consistent labeling and units of measure.
Use of Reference Material

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.
Unsatisfactory

Superficial or no reference material. Little or no literature review.
Developing

Fair evidence of comprehension of reference material but linkage to main points may be incomplete. Evidence that literature review was performed, but may not be adequate.
Satisfactory

Adequate evidence of comprehension and presentation of reference material supporting main points. Evidence of sufficient literature review with citations.
Exemplary

Clear and compelling comprehension and use of reference material. Evidence of review of seminal publications in appropriate field. Evidence of thorough literature review with appropriate citations.
Language/Grammar

Language used is appropriate and topic-related. Report is clear, professional. Good language skills and pronunciation are used.
Unsatisfactory

Use of language is unclear and inadequate.
Poor language skills and pronunciation severely impede understanding.
Developing

Limited variety in language use (with an overuse of general vocabulary) restricts complexity of expression. Limited language skills and faulty pronunciation cause some difficulties in understanding.
Satisfactory

Language control and pronunciation are fairly consistent, but some errors cause occasional difficulties with clarity and understanding.
Exemplary

Language, style, and pronunciation are clear concise, and coherent. Communication is clear and fluent.
Team Contribution

Did everyone contribute to the report? Did everyone seem knowledgeable of the material?
Did the team work together?
Unsatisfactory

Teammates never worked from others’ ideas. The presentation was carried by one person.
Some team members did not contribute
Developing

Teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However, it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others. Transitions somewhat disorganized
Satisfactory

Teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. Appeared that everyone did some work, but only some seemed to be carrying the presentation. Team member transitions fairly well organised.
Exemplary

Teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the report.
Team members transitions organized and seamless




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98