iRubric: Principal Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Principal Interview

RUBRIC

Rubric Code: MX54A47

By michellering

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: K-5

Questions
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Vision
Vision Question 1	Poor Candidate demonstrated no foresight into the implementation of his/her first priority.	Fair Candidate has little foresight into the implementation of his/her first priority.	Good Candidate has adequate foresight into the implementation of his/her first priority.	Excellent Candidate has extensive foresight into the implementation of his/her first priority.
Vision Question 2	Poor Candidate expresses no characteristics of an effective school	Fair Candidate has some ideas of the characteristics of an effective school	Good Candidate has expresses numerous characteristics of an effective school	Excellent Candidate expresses detailed characteristics of an effective school
Vision Question 3	Poor Candidate demonstrated no long-term plans or goals in education	Fair Candidate has some ideas of future goals in education, but did not specifically express what the goals are	Good Candidate has direction of goals in education and a plan to achieve desired goals	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans and is in process in achieving desired goals in education
Instruction
Instruction Question 1	Poor Candidate has very little curriculum knowledge.	Fair Candidate has some curriculum knowledge.	Good Candidate has adequate curriculum knowledge.	Excellent Candidate has comprehensive curriculum knowledge.
Instruction Question 2	Poor Analysis is minimal.	Fair Analysis does not demonstrate sufficient depth.	Good Can analyse issues in education.	Excellent Capable of critical analysis of current issues in education with clear personal opinions.
Management
Management Question 1	Poor Candidate stated a minimal understanding of the role of the principal.	Fair Candidate can state a general role of the principal.	Good Candidate can articulate a defined role of the principal.	Excellent Candidate can articulate a clearly defined role of the principal.
Management Question 2	Poor Has minimal skills to implement effective strategies to maintain high staff morale.	Fair Has some relevant skills to implement effective strategies to maintain high staff morale.	Good Has a range of skills and ability to implement effective strategies to maintain high staff morale.	Excellent Has a wide range of relevant skills and demonstrates effective strategies to maintain high staff morale.
Collaboration
Collaboration Question 1	Poor Candidate has limited vision to develop a team concept with staff and community.	Fair Candidate can articulate a general plan to develop a team concept with staff and community.	Good Candidate can articulate a reasonable plan to develop a team concept with staff and community.	Excellent Candidate can articulate a clearly defined plan to develop a team concept with staff and community.
Collaboration Question 3	Poor Candidate presented a minimal understanding of the principal’s role in assisting teachers in team planning and teaching.	Fair Candidate presented a relevant understanding of the principal’s role in assisting teachers in team planning and teaching.	Good Candidate presented a reasonable understanding of the principal’s role in assisting teachers in team planning and teaching.	Excellent Candidate clearly articulated the principal’s role in assisting teachers in team planning and teaching.
Collaboration Question 2	Poor Candidate presented limited ideas to build rapport with staff.	Fair Candidate presented ideas to build rapport with staff.	Good Candidate presented steps to build rapport with staff.	Excellent Candidate presented a detailed outlined of steps to build rapport with staff.
Ethics
Ethics Question 1	Poor Candidate could not express details of having to make a difficult decision.	Fair Candidate articulates with vague details of having to make a difficult decision.	Good Candidate articulates details of having to make a difficult decision.	Excellent Candidate articulates with clarity and relevance details of having to make a difficult decision.
Ethics Question 2	Poor Candidate does not respond when a parent calls and is upset with something they have done.	Fair Candidate responds with appropriate action, but not in a timely manner when a parent calls.	Good Candidate responds with appropriate action when a parent calls and is upset with something the teacher or they have done.	Excellent Candidate responds with appropriate action, in a timely manner, and informs the teacher when the parent is upset with something they have done. Contact another administrator when a parent calls and is upset with something they have done.
School Environment
School Environment Question 1	Poor Candidate stated a minimal role for parents in the operation of the school.	Fair Candidate can state a general role for parents in the operation of the school.	Good Candidate can articulate a defined role for parents in the operation of the school.	Excellent Candidate can articulate a clearly defined role for parents in the operation of the school.
School Environment Question 2	Poor Candidate did not present a message that he/she wants to convey to visitors when they walk into the building.	Fair Candidate presented a minimal message that he/she wants to convey to visitors when they walk into the building.	Good Candidate presented a general message that he/she wants to convey to visitors when they walk into the building.	Excellent Candidate presented a detailed message that he/she wants to convey to visitors when they walk into the building.
School Environment Question 3	Poor Candidate expressed no major concerns when dealing with student discipline problems.	Fair Candidate expressed few major concerns when dealing with student discipline problems.	Good Candidate expressed all major concerns when dealing with student discipline problems.	Excellent Candidate expressed all major concerns when dealing with student discipline problems and provided solutions.

Keywords:

Interview

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Discuss this rubric