iRubric: Personal Portraits - PowerPoint Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Personal Portraits - PowerPoint Rubric

Rubric for the creation of the PowerPoint

Rubric Code: M3X2W9

By christieberrier

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Personal Portrait Rubric Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Personal Best 5 pts
PowerPoint Design	Poor Design lacks visual impact. No effort was put into the look and feel of the project.	Fair Design distracts because group could not focus on one feel or look to the project.	Good Design is pleasant to look at and supports the overall feel to the presentation.	Great Design is more advanced than a run of the mill presentation. Use of transitions, graphics and other supporting information is advanced.	Personal Best Design looks professional. It is balanced and uses advanced elements in the design.
Group Work	Poor Group did not work well together. Group did not stay on task. Group did little to complete project.	Fair Group worked, but the cooperation was not easy. A product was created that showed effort.	Good Group worked together to make a sound project. Group members did what they needed to do in order to function as a team.	Great Group worked together and functioned well together. A product was created where each role did above and beyond the expected.	Personal Best Group was fantastic, did way more than what was asked. Product was extremely well supported and designed. A WOW group.
Research	Poor Students did not research other students' cultures and used their own words.	Fair Students researched one concept of another culture and included it in their reflection.	Good Students researched three concepts of other cultures and included them in their research.	Great Students included many aspects of cultures from all four regions in their presentation.	Personal Best Students utilized many sources to research cultural symbols from the culture groups involved in the project. They may have utilized personal interviews with other artists or brought in outside sources.
Citation	Poor Students did not cite research, artwork or borrowed graphics.	Fair Students cited only a few research, artwork or borrowed graphics.	Good Students cited every element of their project.	Great Students cited all elements and gave extraneous information on sources.	Personal Best Students cited all elements, gave extraneous information, and created a works cited page.
Follow Directions	Poor Didn't do an adequate job of following directions so that the product directions were not identifiable.	Fair Followed most of the directions, but missed one or two. Most of the product directions can be identified.	Good Followed directions with no personal risks. The directions are identifiable.	Great Followed directions, yet took a few risks to create an original, self-reflective artwork.	Personal Best Followed directions, yet took many risks to create an original, self-reflective artwork.
Individual Responsibilities	Poor Did not work towards group goal by completing requirements determined by group.	Fair Did partial work towards group goal by completing requirements determined by group.	Good Did adequate work towards group goal by completing requirements determined by group. Product created was a sound presentation.	Great Did above average work towards group goal by completing requirements determined by group. Product created was an above average presentation.	Personal Best Did outstanding work towards group goal by completing requirements determined by group. Went above and beyond expectations so that the product created was superior.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric