iRubric: Relief Printmaking - Negative Space Design rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Relief Printmaking - Negative Space Design

Mod/Honors Visual Arts - Relief PMK

Students create a negative space design from their initials and a pursuit they are passionate about.

Rubric Code: LXC6BC6

By TopherLulu

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Negative Space Initials Printmaking
	Excellent: 18-20 Points (N/A)	Strong 17-17.8Points (N/A)	Good 15.5 -16.5 Points (N/A)	Moderate 14-15 Points (N/A)	Weak 9-13 Points (N/A)	Poor 0-8Points 0 pts
Effort, Perserverence, Growth 20 Points	Excellent: -The work conveys the use of negative space and their work demonstrates a distinct measure of success. - Student started with multiple original ideas and refined selected idea(s) through the project.	Strong The work generally exhibits concepts of negative space, demonstrates a measure of success. - Student started with two original ideas and refined selected idea through the project.	Good -Apparent negative space design is noticeable, but the scope of the work is limited or repetitive. - Student refined original idea(s) throughout the project.	Moderate Some negative space design is discernible, but the scope of the work is narrow and/or repetitive. - Student refined original idea(s) at the beginning of the project	Weak The work is mostly repetitive; only a few elements suggest growth or show slight signs of negative space design. - Student only slightly altered original idea.	Poor -Overall, the work shows no indication of growth or transformation. - The ideas in the project do not show development.
Originality, Idea Integration 20 Points	Excellent: -The work clearly demonstrates an original vision and innovative ideas and/or risk- taking. -The work demonstrates a distinct integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Strong - The work generally demonstrates original and innovative ideas. -The work demonstrates a general integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Good - The work demonstrates little originality, and the work shows little innovative thinking. -The work demonstrates limited integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Moderate An idea behind the work is presented and some original ideas or attempts at innovation with materials and techniques seem to be emerging. -The work demonstrates an emerging integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Weak - An idea behind the work is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely mostly on appropriation. - The work demonstrates limited signs integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Poor - An idea behind the work may be presented, but the work comprises trite or simplistic solutions that are poorly executed. - The work does not demonstrate any integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.
Technical, Craftsmanship, Quality 20 Points	Excellent: -The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas. -All 5 prints are turned in and all 5 are of excellent quality. All parts of the image and the edges of the block are crisp and clear. -Overall the work reaches a level of excellent breadth and quality.	Strong -The work is technically strong; the materials and media are used well to express ideas. -All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. All 5 of the prints are of very good quality, with even ink coverage and crisp edges. -Overall the work is of strong breadth and quality.	Good -The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects and articulation of ideas may not work together. - All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. 4 or more of the prints are good quality, with even coverage and crisp edges, some variation. -Overall the work is of good breadth and quality.	Moderate -The work demonstrates moderate technical competence and some knowledgeable use of materials and media. - 5 prints turned in. Prints are moderately consistent, and may have some stray marks or fingerprints.	Weak -The work is generally awkward; it demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials and media. - 4 or fewer prints turned in. More than 3 prints are messy, damaged or smeared. -Overall the work is of weak breadth and quality.	Poor -The work is generally inept; use of materials and media is naïve and lacks skill or technical competence. - 3 or fewer prints turned in. The prints are messy, damaged or smeared. -Overall, the work lacks accomplishment and is of poor breadth and quality.
Composition & Design 20 Points	Excellent: -The work exhibits well-informed decision- making and intention. -The composition of the works display an original, imaginative, and inventive articulation of the elements and principles of design. - Work shows exceptional attention to line variation and/or range of values.	Strong -The work shows evidence of thoughtful decision making and intention. -The work generally demonstrates imaginative ideas and effective manipulation of the elements and principles of design. - Work shows strong attention to line variation and/or range of values.	Good -Some clear decision making and intention are evident. -The composition of the works demonstrates some imaginative ideas and purposeful manipulation of the elements and principles of design. - Work shows some attention to line variation and/or range of values.	Moderate -Decision making and intention are questionable. -Some imaginative ideas about the use of the elements and principles of design appear to be emerging. - Lines show little variation.	Weak -Intention is not clear. -The work relies heavily on unoriginal ideas and lacks invention or imaginative use of the elements and principles of design. - Line variation or value range is repetitive.	Poor -The work appears to be unconsidered and to lack discernible intention. -The work lacks originality or imagination. - Variation in line and/or value is poor or simplistic.
Cooperation & Clean-up 10 Points	Excellent: Points: 9-10 - The student is almost always on task in the studio, follows the directions for the project the first time they are given, and cleans up their work area in a timely fashion. - The student consistently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student consistently offers constructive critiques	Strong Points: 8 The student is sometimes off task, follows directions for the project, and cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion. - The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student usually offers constructive critiques.	Good Points: 7 The student's participation does not reflect one of the following: The student is sometimes off task, follows directions for the project, and cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion. - The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student usually offers constructive critiques.	Moderate Points: 6 - The student is frequently off task in the studio, may not follow directions, or delays cleanup. - The student sometimes shows respect for classmates. -The student rarely offers constructive critiques.	Weak Points: 5 The student is frequently off task in the studio. - The student may rarely show respect for classmates. -The student does not participate in critiques.	Poor Points: 0-4 The student does not follow directions, or refuses to participate in the project fully. Student may misuse, waste or destroy art materials carelessly. Student may leave a mess. - The student may rarely show respect for classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student offers destructive critique or does not participate in critiques.
Presentation & Reflection 10 Points	Excellent: Points: 9-10 -Presentation reflects project's process, strengths, and weaknesses. -Student expresses their goals for their project and their future project plan.	Strong Points: 8 Presentation does not reflect one of the following: process, strengths, and/or weaknesses. Or Student is unable to express goals and/or plan.	Good Points: 7 Presentation does not reflect more than one of the following: project's process, strengths, and/or weaknesses. Or Student is unable to express goals and/or plan.	Moderate Points: 6 Presentation does not reflect project process, strengths, and/or weaknesses. Or Student is unable to express goals and/or plan.	Weak Points:5 Student's presentation does not articulate their project goals, they are not enthusiastic about their work, and/or are not responsive to constructive criticism.	Poor Points: 0-4 Student is unorganized, unprepared, and unresponsive to the criticism. Student seemed to make up their presentation on the spot.

Keywords:

Visual Arts

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric