Skip to main content
iRubric: Outline, Cornell, Mind Mapping rubric

iRubric: Outline, Cornell, Mind Mapping rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Outline, Cornell, Mind Mapping 
Note-Taking
Students have applied three different note taking methods to their core classes.
Rubric Code: L2W547A
By MrFiliatreault
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Class note  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric TAKING NOTES
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization

Poor

Notes looked like sentences. No space was given between facts. It would be difficult to find information quickly in this.
Fair

Notes sometimes looked like notes, but sometimes looked like sentences. Little, if any, space is given between facts. It might be difficult to find information in this.
Good

For the most part, notes looked like notes and not paragraphs. Most information was brief. There was space between facts. It would be fairly easy to find information in this.
Excellent

Notes looked like notes, rather than paragraphs. There were short blurbs of information, not complete sentences. There was adequate space and grouping between facts. It would be easy and quick to find information in this.
Tools

Poor

Tools such as lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols and/or sketches were not used.
Fair

One tool was used (either a list, bullets, abbreviations, symbols or sketches).
Good

Some tools were used, which may have included lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols and/or sketches.
Excellent

Several tools were used including lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols and/or sketches.
Wording

Poor

Information was clearly too lengthy and probably plagiarized. Words were constantly written or repeated unnecessarily. Time was wasted just copying.
Fair

Information was not shortened and may have been plagiarized. Words were unnecessarily written or repeated. Time may have been wasted copying.
Good

Information was sometimes put into "caveman talk" (little words usually omitted; repetition often avoided) or wording was sometimes changed to avoid plagiarism and wasted time.
Excellent

Information was put into "caveman talk" (little words omitted; repetition avoided) or wording was changed to avoid plagiarism and wasted time.
Cornell Method

Poor

Did not present a Cornell Method set of notes from a core class
Fair

Cornell method is used but lacks full use of the organizational method.
Good

Cornell method is used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements
Excellent

Cornell method is fully used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements
Outline Method

Poor

Did not present a Outline Method set of notes from a core class
Fair

Outline method is used but lacks full use of the organizational method.
Good

Outline method is used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements
Excellent

Outline method is fully used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements
Mind Mapping Method

Poor

Did not present a Mind Mapping set of notes from a core class
Fair

Mind Mapping method is used but lacks full use of the organizational method.
Good

Mind Mapping method is used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements
Excellent

Mind Mapping method is fully used. There is use of sections, bolding, underling, point form and other creative elements





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16