iRubric: Printmaking: Monotype rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Printmaking: Monotype

Students work a photo of their pet or an animal. Students will create a monotype and embellish with prismacolor pencils.

Rubric Code: L24WAAA

By kim1mason

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Monotype Printmaking
	Excellent: 100 (N/A)	Strong 99 (N/A)	Average 98 (N/A)	Emerging 97 (N/A)	Additional work needed 95 (N/A)
Original Work, Ideas, Sketches	Excellent: -The sketches and final work clearly demonstrate a personal vision, individual mark-making, and innovative ideas and/or risk- taking. -The work demonstrates a distinct integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.	Strong - The sketches and final work generally demonstrate original and innovative ideas, with some personalization. -The work demonstrates a general integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.	Average - The sketches and final work demonstrates attempts at originality - Attempts at innovation with materials and techniques seem to be emerging. -The work demonstrates limited integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Emerging - An idea behind the work is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely mostly on appropriation. - The work demonstrates limited signs integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.	Additional work needed - An idea behind the work may be presented, but the work comprises trite or simplistic solutions that are poorly executed. - The work does not demonstrate any integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.
Problem Solving & Proofs	Excellent: - Student created composition. - Student extensively refined selected idea(s) through the project, experimented with the materials, and shows much growth. - The student consistently sought to troubleshoot and solve any technical or design problems. - Student showed consistent time management.	Strong - Student created composition. - Student refined the selected idea through the project (as documented through sketches and stage proofs), showing some growth and experimentation. - The student frequently sought to troubleshoot and solve technical or design problems. - Student showed frequent time management.	Average - Student created composition. - Student refined original idea (as documented through sketches and stage proofs), but the idea could still benefit from more development. - The student stayed with one or two processes and did not experiment much. - The student sometimes sought to troubleshoot and solve technical or design problems. - Student showed some time management.	Emerging - Student created composition. - The student did not experiment with the materials. - The student sometimes sought to troubleshoot and solve technical or design problems. - Student showed limited time management.	Additional work needed -Student created composition. - The ideas in the project do not show development. - The student rarely sought to troubleshoot and solve technical or design problems. - Student negligible time management.
Technical, Craftsmanship, Quality	Excellent: -The work is technically excellent. - Ink application is always intentional and consistent. - Curation is invisible.	Strong -The work is technically strong. - Most parts of the image are clear and the borders are generally clean. - Ink application is generally consistent and intentional.	Average -The work demonstrates developing technical competence and use of materials and media. - Ink application has some inconsistencies and may not be entirely intentional.	Emerging - The work demonstrates marginal technical competence. - Inking is not consistent, edges are dirty. - Prints may have stray marks or fingerprints.	Additional work needed -The work is generally inept; use of materials and media lacks skill or technical competence. - The print are messy, damaged or smeared.
Composition & Design	Excellent: -The work exhibits well-informed decision- making and composition shows intention. -The prints display an imaginative articulation of the elements and principles of design. - Work shows exceptional attention to color and paint application. - Prints show dynamic representation and composition of subject.	Strong -The work generally demonstrates imaginative ideas and effective manipulation of the elements and principles of design. - Work shows strong attention to color and paint application - Prints show some consideration the representation and composition of subject.	Average -Some decision making and compositional intention are evident. -Some imaginative ideas about the use of the elements and principles of design appear to be emerging. - Work shows some attention to color and paint application. - Prints show more attention only to representation or composition of subject. .	Emerging -Intention is not clear. -The work relies heavily on unoriginal ideas and lacks invention or imaginative use of the elements and principles of design. - Paint application and color choices do not connect with concept. - Consideration of representation or composition of subject seems muddled. composition of subject.	Additional work needed -The work appears to be unconsidered and to lack discernible intention. -The work lacks originality or imagination. - Variation in line and/or textures is poor or simplistic. - Representation or placement of subject appear unconsidered.
Cooperation & Clean-up	Excellent: - The student is always prompt and on task in the studio & follows the directions for the project the first time they are given. -Student consistently cleans up their work area in a timely fashion without prompting. - The student consistently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student consistently offers constructive critiques to peers.	Strong - The student is almost always on task and follows directions for the project. - Student cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion, with minimal reminders. - The student frequently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student usually offers constructive critiques to peers.	Average -The student's participation does not reflect one of the following: being on time, being on task, following directions for the project, and cleaning up his/her work area in a timely fashion. - The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student could offer additional constructive critiques to peers.	Emerging - The student is frequently late, off task in the studio, may not follow directions, or delays cleanup. - The student sometimes shows respect for classmates. -The student rarely offers constructive critiques.	Additional work needed - The student does not follow directions, or refuses to participate in the project fully. - Student may misuse, waste or destroy art materials carelessly. - Student may leave a mess. - The student may rarely show respect for classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words. -The student offers destructive critique or does not participate in critiques.
Portfolio? Did you enter your monotype?	Excellent:	Strong	Average	Emerging	Additional work needed

Keywords:

Visual Arts

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric