- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Digital Fabrication Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Digital Fabrication Research Project Contemporary Artist Research Project Rubric Code: L24967W By mconnell29 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Criteria
	Good 10-7 points (N/A)	Average 6-4 points (N/A)	Poor 3-0 points (N/A)
1 10 pts Title, Your Name, Date (Slide 1) All key elements of the designer's life are included and accurate. (Slide 2)	Good Information is clear and well stated. Designer's name, date of birth, death (if applicable), and country of origin are included in presentation. Interesting childhood details and other facts regarding the designer's life are included in your first slide.	Average Information is clear but some information is missing or more effort could have been put into finding interesting details about the designer's childhood/life.	Poor Information is not clear. Facts are incomplete, or incorrect.
2 10 pts The information about the structure/exhibit is comprehensive and accurate. The presentation includes at least 3 images and at least 10 facts about the design, fabrication, and assembly of the structure. (Slides 3-5)	Good The student includes sufficient information and research to describe the designer's work. At least 3 images and at least 10 facts are included.	Average The student provides some information, but some information is lacking (less than 3 images and 10 facts).	Poor The information is very lacking and incomplete.
3 10 pts Presentation	Good Work is neatly presented. Information is listed in bullet points, and spelling and grammar have been checked. Fonts are consistent and easy to read.	Average Work is good, but could be neater with more effort.	Poor Lack of effort or incomplete. Did not follow directions or accept help offered.
4 10 pts Effort	Good Attention to detail and plenty of time were put into the project.	Average Some attention to detail and adequate time were put into the project.	Poor Minimal attention and time were put into the project.
5 10 pts Sources (Slide 6)	Good At least two reputable sources are listed on the last slide. Reputable sources end in .org, .edu, or .gov.	Average At least one reputable source is listed on the last slide.	Poor No reputable sources are listed.