iRubric: Community Assessment for Disaster Readiness rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Community Assessment for Disaster Readiness

Students will perform an assessment of a community, appraise the local healthcare system's to assess capability to respond, formulate recommendations for enhanced readiness, and identify special populations in the community necessitating enhanced assistance.intervention plan.

Rubric Code: KCA3AA

By kwilcox4

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Nursing

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Community health assessment Overall determination of the local community's readiness to respond to a MCI
	Excellent (N/A)	Average (N/A)	Acceptable (N/A)	Unacceptable (N/A)
Assessment 25 pts Student conducts a comprehensive assessment of the local community to identify emergency preparedness plans/protocol, chain of command, community resources, communication structure, and plans for maintaining readiness	Excellent Work indicates that student has performed a thorough assessment of the community to assimilate data for the five required components of the survey.	Average Work indicates that student has performed an assessment of the community to assimilate data for four of the five required components of the survey.	Acceptable Work indicates that student has performed an assessment of the community to assimilate data for three of the five required components of the survey	Unacceptable Work indicates that student has not adequately evaluated the community. Information is incomplete, with less than three of the required components being addressed.
Appraisal of Healthcare System 15 pts Student uses assessment information to appraise local healthcare system's capability to respond to a MTI	Excellent Student demonstrates an ability to appraise the local healthcare systems to determine potential response capability for a MCI. Linkages between assessment findings and predicted readiness for a MCI can be determined.	Average Student demonstrates a limited ability to appraise the local healthcare systems to determine potential response capability for a MCI. Linkages between assessment findings and predicted readiness for a MCI are not clear.	Acceptable Student is not able to clearly connect assessment findings to the local healthcare system's readiness due to gaps in information.	Unacceptable Minimal connection between assessment findings and identified community risks. Risks may incompletely identified or not identified at all.
Formulation of Recommendations 15 pts Student relates findings to formulate recommendations for enhanced readiness	Excellent Student is able to link all findings to prioritized, pro-active recommendations for improved readiness.	Average Student is able to link some of the findings to pro-active recommendations but fails to recognize those of priority for improved readiness.	Acceptable Proactive recommendations are vague or inappropriate for the findings. 3 points	Unacceptable Student is not able to clearly identify pro-active recommendations of priority for findings. Paper fails to document either findings or corrective recommendations.
Development of action plan 25 pts Student develops a plan based on assessment findings to improve community readiness	Excellent Student's action plan demonstrates a clear relationship between the findings and corrective actions indicated to enhance preparation.	Average Student's action plan demonstrates a relationship between the findings and corrective actions but minor inconstancies are noted.	Acceptable Student's action plan demonstrates a vague relationship between the findings and/or corrective actions but major inconstancies are noted.	Unacceptable Student's action plan fails to demonstrate a relationship or the findings fail to provide the basis for formulating corrective actions.
Identify Special Populations 10 pts Student able to identify special populations at risk in the community, which will necessitate enhanced assistance	Excellent Paper includes identification of special populations inhabiting the community and specific needs that will require enhanced assistance during a MCI.	Average Paper identifies special populations in the community but fails to address specific needs to be considered in a MCI.	Acceptable Special populations are casually mentioned in the paper but special needs are not addressed.	Unacceptable Special populations are not addressed in the paper.
Mechanics and References 10 pts Paper consistently conforms to academic writing standards	Excellent Paper conforms consistently to APA (6th ed.) guidelines Conforms consistently to rules of grammar, usage, & punctuation. Resources and references relevant and in APA format.	Average APA (6th ed.) guidelines followed but minimum errors. Minimum variances to rules of grammar, usage, & punctuation. Resources and references relevant but not in APA format.	Acceptable Conformity to APA (6th ed.) guidelines and rules of grammar, usage, & punctuation inconsistent. Resources and references relevant but not in APA format.	Unacceptable Lacks conformity to APA (6th ed.) guidelines and rules of grammar, usage, & punctuation inconsistent. Resources and references irrelevant and/ or not in APA format.

Keywords:

Concepts/Assessment/Presentation/

Subjects:

Nursing

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric