Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Microteaching Performance Assessment
Microteaching Performance Assessment
Rubric Code:
K495A5
By
vicky_gat
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Test Preparation
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Microteaching
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor or Missing
1 pts
Lesson Aim
Excellent
The lesson is based on a clear aim. The aim is complete and well written
Good
The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, but it is well written
Fair
The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, and it is not well written
Poor or Missing
The lesson is not based on an aim.
Content of Lesson
Excellent
Content of lesson is grade level appropriate (14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Good
One of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Fair
Two of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Poor or Missing
Three of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Instructional Components of Lesson
Excellent
Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included and effective. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Good
One of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Fair
Two or more of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Poor or Missing
Several of the following areas are either missing and/or ineffective. Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Pattern in the reading task
Excellent
The activities in the reading lesson follow this pattern:
1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Good
The activities in the reading lesson follow this pattern but without respecting a logical order:
1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Fair
The activities in the reading lesson follow only two elements of this pattern :
1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Poor or Missing
The activities in the reading lesson follow only one element of this pattern :
1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Quality of Presentation
Excellent
Quality of voice, professional behavior, organization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation are evident.
Good
One to two of the following are deficient: quality of voice, professional behavior, orgaization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Fair
Three of the following are deficient : quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Poor or Missing
Four or more of the following are deficient or unacceptable: quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Preparedness
Excellent
The work group is completety prepared, has rehearsed and respect the assigned time.
Good
The work group seem pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. They respect the assigned time.
Fair
The work group seem pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. They do not respect the assigned time.
Poor or Missing
The work group does not seem at all prepared to present.
Language Use
Excellent
The speech presents no grammatical mistakes or they are not noticeable.
Good
There are some minor grammatical mistakes along the speech but they do not affect the comprehension of the information.
Fair
There are some important grammatical mistakes which affect the comprehension at trhe level of sentence but not the whole information.
Poor or Missing
The speech can not be followed because of the amount of grammatical mistakes
Pronunciation
Excellent
The student speaks clearly and distinctly all the time. There aren't pronunciation mistakes or they are not noticeable.
Good
The student speaks clearly and distinctly most of the time. Pronunciation mistakes occur rarely and they do not affect the comprehension of the message.
Fair
The student speaks clearly most of the time. A few important pronunciation mistakes occur which affect the meaning of words, expressions or phrase. There are some sounds from the mother tongue.
Poor or Missing
The student often mumbles or can not be understood. Pronunciation is poor and there are a lot of sounds from the mother tongue.
Keywords:
lesson plans, micro teaching
Subjects:
Test Preparation
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Test Preparation rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2023
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n126
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.