Skip to main content
iRubric: Drypoint Prints rubric

iRubric: Drypoint Prints rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Drypoint Prints 
Students develop a series of drawings that they develop into a drypoint plate. Students print a variable edition of 3 prints. The prints are presented in a critique format at the end of the project.
Rubric Code: JX43222
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Print Edition of 3
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

5 pts

Grade

(N/A)

Original Work, Ideas, Sketches

Excellent

The sketches and final work clearly demonstrate a personal vision, individual mark-making, and innovative ideas and/or risk-
taking.
-The work demonstrates a distinct integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.
Good

The sketches and final work generally demonstrate original and innovative ideas, with some personalization.
-The work demonstrates a general integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.
Fair

The sketches and final work demonstrates little originality
- Attempts at innovation
with materials and techniques seem to be emerging.
-The work demonstrates limited integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.
Poor

An idea behind the work is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely
mostly on appropriation.
- The work demonstrates limited signs integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.
Grade

_____________
Technical, Craftsmanship, Quality

Excellent

The work is technically excellent.
-All 3 prints are turned in
- All parts of the image are clear
- All of the prints are titled, signed/dated, and labeled in pencil.
Good

The work is technically strong.
- All 3 prints in the edition are turned in.
- Most parts of the image are clear
Fair

-The work demonstrates developing technical competence and use of materials and media.
- All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. 3 of the prints ar Prints are lacking one of the following: title, signature, label.e good quality.
Poor

- Inking is not consistent, Prints may have stray marks or fingerprints.
- Automatic if 3 or fewer prints turned in.
- Prints are lacking more than one of the following: titled, signed/dated, numbered, in pencil.
Grade

_____________
Composition & Design

Excellent

- Work shows exceptional attention to line quality and range of textures.
- Prints show dynamic representation and placement of subject.
Good

- Work shows strong attention to line quality and range of textures.
- Prints show some consideration the representation and placement of subject.
Fair

Work shows some attention to line quality and range of textures.
- Prints show more attention only to representation or placement of subject.
Poor

-Intention is not clear.
-The work relies heavily on unoriginal ideas and lacks invention or imaginative use of the
elements and principles of design.
Grade

_____________
Cooperation & Clean-up

Excellent

- The student is almost always on task in the studio & follows the directions for the project the first time they are given.
-Student consistently cleans up their work area in a timely fashion.
Good

- The student is sometimes off task, but follows directions for the project.
- Student cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion, with minimal reminders.
Fair

-The student's participation does not reflect one of the following: being on task, following directions for the project, and cleaning up his/her work area in a timely fashion.
Poor

- The student is frequently off task in the studio, may not follow directions, or delays cleanup.
Grade

_____________
Effort

Excellent

Class time was used wisely. An exceptional amount of work was completed including multiple drafts and practice for the final project. Students was receptive and responsive to feedback.
Good

Class time was almost always used wisely. An adequate amount of work was completed. Student was receptive to feedback.
Fair

Class time was somewhat used wisely. Student somewhat completed including multiple drafts and practice for the final project. Student was somewhat receptive to feedback.
Poor

Class time was not used wisely. Little work was completed. Students was not receptive to feedback, disregarding suggestions.
Grade

_____________
Grade:

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Grade

_____________



Keywords:
  • Printmaking, Intaglio, Drypoint


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16