iRubric: Human Rights Trial rubric

Information that the student chose to present was appropriate and displayed a sophisticated understanding of the legal issues and how they relate to the facts of the case. Other students in the group were properly set up or supported by the information presented by the student.

Information presented by the student showed a good understanding of the legal issues and their relationship to the facts. Some nuance was missed but other group members were generally well set up and supported by the information presented.

Information presented by the student showed only a superficial understanding of the legal issues and how they relate to the facts. Other group members' portion suffered from the lack of good logical set up and support from the student's presentation.

Student's portion of the presentation was very persuasive to the overall argument of the group. If the student was asked a follow up question or was challenged on a point, they answered persuasively in support of their position.

Student's portion of the presentation was persuasive but left open some questions with respect to the overall argument of the group. If the student was asked a question or was challenged on a point they provided a logical answer in support of their position.

Student's portion of the presentation was not persuasive or undermined the group's argument. If the student was asked a question, they could not answer or could not understand the significance of the question.