Skip to main content

iRubric: Vision Project Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Vision Project Rubric

Rubric Code: H2BA49

By pereau

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: (none)

Vision Project Rubric Evaluation of Vision Project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	excellent 4 pts
project goal(s) Considered the broad goals for the project as part of project design. Listed and considered specific, concrete goals to be accomplished.	Poor Project goal(s) unstated or unclear Project's relationship to goal not given, and not immediately apparent.	Fair project goal stated, but not clarified. Relationship between goal(s) and project not fully developed Not easy to understand the relationship	Good Project goal(s) clearly stated and explained. Relationship between goal(s) and project are direct with a developed explanation.	excellent Project goal(s) are clear, detailed and articulate. Goals appear ambitious but realizable. Relationship between goal(s) and project are clear, direct and imaginative.
Project alternatives Considered alternative projects that could accomplish goals.	Poor Only one possibility for project was considered.	Fair project alternatives were "pro forma" and not fully considered.	Good Several project alternatives were considered, with pros and cons listed for each.	excellent Many project alternatives were considered with clearly articulated pros & cons. Synergies between proposals were also considered with pros & cons.
Project description Provide a project description that clearly conveys the goals, content and implementation strategy for project.	Poor Description is broad strokes, vague, and lacks detail. No strategy for implementation given.	Fair Description includes some details, but remains an abstraction. Implementation strategy remains vague or disjointed.	Good Description contains sufficient details to understand the projects content and intentions. Strategy for implementation is logical and specific.	excellent Description is rich in details, stating clearly the intentions, the content, and includes innovative features. The strategy for implementation is clear and detailed showing surprising and imaginative ways of pursuing project.
Project resources Develop resources - individuals, groups, organizations, information sources to assist in realizing the project.	Poor No resources, or few, were developed. No contacts, or only a few contacts were pursued. Only listed and not wrapped into project.	Fair Several resources were found; some were contacted or developed. Project not evolved to take full advantage of resources	Good Many resources were identified; many contacts were initiated and followed up. Project changes and grows in response to opportunities that emerge from resources.	excellent Many unusual resources identified, as well as evident ones; contacts initiated and "buy-in" solicited and found. Project matures into a cooperative venture with resources and support organizations.
Project management Means and ways to make project self-sustaining over the long term.	Poor No, or little, consideration given to means of continuing project. Vague mention of possible groups who "could do it".	Fair Some consideration given to project continuation. No firm understanding of scope and need for active supervision and continuation of project	Good Thoughtful consideration of project continuation. Clear identification of possible individuals and groups; contacts made and level of interest and investment ascertained.	excellent Creative solutions proposed for project continuation; follow up exploration and dialogue. Clear identification of individuals and groups with interest and investment in project; contacts made, dialogue engaged, and "buy-in" agreement reached.
Project costs Demonstrates solid investigation of possible costs for project - both up front and on-going.	Poor No costs ascertained, or so few as to be unhelpful in determining overall project cost.	Fair Many of projects costs determined, but still missing significant costs - either by overlooking cost element or by insufficient research.	Good Most significant cost factors determined and ascertained. Project re-evaluated with costs in mind: group engaged in "value engineering".	excellent All significant costs determined; creative use of resources to limit or eliminate some cost factors. Project re-evalued and imaginatively revised to cope with costs without losing sight of goals and maintaining project scope and creative flair
Project Presentation: Graphics, illustrations	Poor No graphics, diagrams, illustrations used. No graphic design used. Awkward layout.	Fair Some graphics, pictures used. Some not well-chosen, or executed. Not well integrated with text.	Good Graphics & pictures are appropriate and support or extend the message of the text.	excellent Graphics are creative extensions of the Project, illustrating the feel of the project and allowing text to be minimal in presentation. Graphics varied in type, each selected to convey project goals, intentions and implementation
Project Presentation: Text, mechanics Text is edited and free of spelling or grammar errors. Text is concise, clear and appropriate. Text combined well with illustrations	Poor Text poorly written, unclear. Too much reliance on text to convey project intention. Many misspellings, other errors; misallignments	Fair Text used when illustrations would make project more clear. Text jumps from one idea to another. Several errors in mechanics.	Good Text used appropriately to emphasize points. Text combined with illustrations to clarify information, ideas. No errors in mechanics.	excellent Text used creatively to enhance graphics; clarify project intentions. Text and graphics combine to create heirarchy of infomation; color and emphasis allow quick comprehension of information. Each slide complete and clear w/o overloading
Project presentation Notes Notes provide clear and concise elaboration of slides. Notes provide credits, and contact information where necessary.	Poor No notes; or too few notes to provide full explanation of presentation in absence of vocal commentary. Notes not related to slide.	Fair Some notes on all slides; insufficient information to provide full picture of project. Reliance on notes to tell story; impact of slides downgraded.	Good Notes appropriately expand presentation; give background and further links. Do not replace information on slides which remain paramount.	excellent Notes and slides work together to provide a complete picture of the project. Notes provide engaging in-depth information, intriguing commentary on project development.
Project progress Project emerges through cycles of work and revision to improve every aspect: goals, content, implementation, costs and management.	Poor Project remains static. No evidence of cycles to review and make improvements.	Fair Project cycles sluggishly, changing only in small details. No engaged effort to make large and effective changes to improve the project.	Good Project reveals consistent effort to work and reflect on the work. Cycles produce major improvements in project in one or more of the critical areas.	excellent Project cycles effectively and thoroughly through all the critical areas. Cycles produce major changes, improvements and innovations in all of the critical areas.
Teamwork Team members work well together, respecting each other contributions. All team members share equally in the work.	Poor Team is held back by conflicts they cannot/do not resolve. Team members not equally involved. Some team members opt out or dominate the project	Fair Team works reasonably well, but get hung up on issues. Some team members contribute much more to effort than others.	Good Team works well together and resolve conflicts/disagreements quickly and equably. Team members share in work, contribute equally.	excellent Team works efficiently and effectively; members prepare ahead of time and come to meetings able to work on project, not just talk. Team members share work and contribute equally, stimulating and supporting each other to each the project goals.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n243