Skip to main content

iRubric: Website / ePortfolio Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Website / ePortfolio Rubric 
Rubric to evaluate a website or ePortfolio made by students.
Rubric Code: GXXXX49
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric ePortfolio Rubric
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Design Elements
Background

Excellent

Background is exceptionally attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Good

Background is attractive, consistent across pages, adds to the theme or purpose of the site, and does not detract from readability.
Fair

Background is consistent across pages and does not detract from readability.
Poor

Background detracts from the readability of the site.
Fonts

Excellent

The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. Use of font styles (italic, bold, underline) is used consistently and improves readability.
Good

The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Fair

The fonts are consistent and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Poor

A wide variety of fonts, styles and point sizes was used.
Layout

Excellent

The Web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Good

The Web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
Fair

The Web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.
Poor

The Web pages are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Navigation

Excellent

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Good

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where s/he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Fair

Links for navigation take the reader where s/he expects to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost.
Poor

Some links do not take the reader to the sites described. A user typically feels lost.
Content
Artifacts/Evidence

Excellent

All professional and program competency artifacts are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio and are well-organized. They additionally demonstrate programmatic competency achievement.
Good

Most professional and classroom samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. One or two examples are unorganized or unrelated. They additionally demonstrate programmatic competency achievement.
Fair

Several professional and classroom samples are not related to the purpose of the eportfolio. Several examples are unorganized and unclear. Missing evidence of competency demonstration in some areas.
Poor

Most of the professional and classroom samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio. Missing evidence of all program competencies.
Link Quality

Excellent

All links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Good

Almost all links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Fair

Most links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Poor

Less than 3/4 of the links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
Accessibility

Excellent

All images, especially those that are used for navigation, have an ALT tag that describes the image and its link so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Good

All images used for navigation have an ALT tag that describes the image and where it links to so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Fair

Most images used for navigation have an ALT tag that describes the image and where it links to so people who are visually impaired can use the Web site well.
Poor

The needs of visually impaired Internet users are ignored.
Citations & References

Excellent

Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for all borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Good

Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for almost all borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Fair

Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for most borrowed material. No material is included from Web sites that state that permission is required unless permission has been obtained.
Poor

Borrowed materials are not properly documented OR material was borrowed without permission from a site that requires permission
Reflections

Excellent

Reflections are present throughout the portfolio demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, and how learning was applied to the program field.
Good

Reflections are present in the portfolio and demonstrating how learning occurred, what learning occurred, but may not include either how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Fair

Few reflections are present in the portfolio. If they are present they do not provide any depth of understanding of how learning occurred, what learning occurred, how learning was integrated throughout the program, or how learning was applied to the program field.
Poor

No reflections are present in the portfolio.
Spelling and Grammar

Excellent

There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Good

There are 1-3 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Fair

There are 4-5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Poor

There are more than 5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Web site.
Service Learning
Academics / Learning

Excellent

Students have direct application of new skills or knowledge in community service. Service learning is seen as a vital instructional activity.
Good

Students have some active application of new skills or knowledge. Service learning has strong connection to instruction.
Fair

Students only has some application of new skills or knowledge. Service learning has minimal connection to instruction.
Poor

Student do not use skills or knowledge outside classroom. No active service experience. Activity has no connection to instruction.
Student Reflection

Excellent

Students actively reflect on their learning and think, share, and produce relective products based upon those reflections.
Good

Student reflection provides basic insight into their learning. Students produce minimal reflective products based upon those reflections.
Fair

Student share minimal reflection on service learning and produce no individual reflection projects.
Poor

No time given for true active reflection. Student provided only a summary of events.
Developing a sense of caring

Excellent

Reflections show deep personal understanding of the importance of service in student's ability to make a difference. Student will likely take the initiative to serve again.
Good

Reflections show growing understanding of the importance of service in student's ability to make a difference. Student may serve again.
Fair

Reflections show limited understanding of the importance of service. Student may serve again if asked.
Poor

Reflections show student largely unaffected by the importance of service. Student is unlikely to serve again.
Quality of life

Excellent

.Service activity facilitates change or insight, helps solve a problem, meet a need or address an issue in community served.
Good

Service activity provides some change or insight. Service enhances an already good community situation.
Fair

Service mainly decorative, but activity provides some benefit to community served.
Poor

Service mainly decorative, but service provides limited community benefit or does not offer any new or unique opportunity





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n112