Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: IB Comparative study rubric

iRubric: IB Comparative study rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
IB Comparative study IB Comparative study Rubric Code: FXB3B4C By salamoni Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Comparative Study External Assessment 20%
	Poor 0 pts	poor 2 pts	fair 4 pts	good 5 pts	Excellent 6 pts	Enter Title (N/A)	Enter Title (N/A)	Enter Title (N/A)
Analysis of formal qualities To what extent does the work demonstrate effective identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the formal qualities of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts? no higher then a 3 if not at least 3 artworks by at least 2 different artists.	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	poor The work identifies some formal qualities of the selected pieces from at least two cultural origins. There is little or no attempt at analysis.	fair The work identifies and descries the formal qualities of the selected pieces from at least two cultural origins. Th analysis of these formal qualities is inconsistent.	good The work identifies and analyses the formal qualities of the selected pieces from at least two cultural origins. The analysis of these formal qualities is consistently informed and effective.	Excellent The work identifies and analyses the formal qualities of the selected pieces from at least two cultural origins. The analysis of these formal qualities is consistently informed and effective.	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
Interpretation of function/purpose To what extent does the work demonstrate informed and appropriate interpretation of the function and purpose of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts within the cultural context in which they were created?	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	poor The work demonstrates an interpretation of the function and purpose of the selected pieces within the cultural context in which they were created, but this is largely undeveloped superficial or relies heavily on personal opinion.	fair the work demonstrates an interpretation of the function and purpose of the selected pieces within the cultural context in which they were created, although this is not always consistently informed or developed.	good the work demonstrates a consistently informed and appropriate interpretation of the function and purpose of the selected pieces within the cultural context in which they were created.	Excellent the work demonstrates a consistently informed and appropriate interpretation of the function and purpose of the selected pieces within the cultural context in which they were created.	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
Evaluation of cultural significance To what extent does the work demonstrate informed understanding of the cultural significance of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts within the specific context in which they were created?	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	poor the work demonstrates an evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces within the specific context in which they were created, but this largely undeveloped superficial or relies heavily on personal opinion.	fair the work demonstrates an evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces within the specific context in which they were created although this is not always consistently informed or developed.	good the work demonstrates consistently informed and appropriate evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces within the specific context in which they were created.	Excellent the work demonstrates consistently informed and appropriate evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces within the specific context in which they were created.	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
Making comparisons and connections To what extent does the work demonstrate effective identification and critical analysis of the connections, similarities and differences between the selected artworks, objects and artifacts?	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	poor the work outlines connections, similarities and differences between the selected pieces, with little critical analysis. These connections are largely superficial or inappropriate and demonstrate a basic understanding of how the pieces compare	fair the work describes the connections, similarities and differences between the selected pieces, with some underdeveloped critical analysis. the connections are logical and coherent and demonstrate a sound understanding of how the pieces compare.	good The work critically analyses the connections, similarities and difference between the selected pieces. These connections are logical and coherent, showing a thorough understanding of how to pieces compare.	Excellent The work critically analyses the connections, similarities and difference between the selected pieces. These connections are logical and coherent, showing a thorough understanding of how to pieces compare.	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
Presentation sub-specific language To what extent does the work ensure that information is conveyed clearly and coherently in a visually appropriate and legible manner, supported by the consistent use of appropriate subject-specific language?	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	poor the work makes some attempt to convey information clearly or in a visually appropriate manner; however this may be inconsistent or not always appropriate. there is some attempt to use subject specific language but this may be infrequent or with inaccuracies.	fair the work clearly and coherently conveys information in a visually appropriate and legible manner, with some consistent use of appropriate subject specific language.	good The work clearly and coherently conveys information which results in a visually appropriate, legible and engaging study. Subject-specific language is used accurately and appropriately throughout.	Excellent The work clearly and coherently conveys information which results in a visually appropriate, legible and engaging study. Subject-specific language is used accurately and appropriately throughout.	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
HL Only
	Poor 2 pts	Poor 3 pts	fair 4 pts	fair 6 pts	good 7 pts	good 9 pts	excellent 10 pts	excellent 12 pts
F Making connections to own art: analyse and reflect on the outcomes of the comparative study investigation and on how this has influenced the student’s own development as an artist, identifying connections between one or more of the selected works and the student’s own art-making processes and practices?influenced the student’s own development as an artist, identifying connections between one or more of the selected works and the student’s own art-making processes and practices	Poor The work does not reach a standard identified by the descriptor.	Poor The work outlines the outcomes of the investigation making few or only superficial connections to their own art-making practice.	fair The work describes the outcomes of the investigation but without considering the implications on their own development. The student makes attempts to make connections to their own art-making practice, but these are inconsistent or superficial.	fair The work describes the outcomes of the investigation but without considering the implications on their own development. The student makes attempts to make connections to their own art-making practice, but these are inconsistent or superficial.	good The work reflects upon the outcomes of the investigation consistently with some attempts at analysis and consideration of their own development, however this lacks depth. The student makes some meaningful connections to their own art-making practice, but these are underdeveloped.	good The work reflects upon the outcomes of the investigation consistently with some attempts at analysis and consideration of their own development, however this lacks depth. The student makes some meaningful connections to their own art-making practice, but these are underdeveloped.	excellent The work analyses and reflects upon the outcomes of the investigation consistently and appropriately. The student effectively considers their own development, making informed and meaningful connections to their own art-making practice.	excellent The work analyses and reflects upon the outcomes of the investigation consistently and appropriately. The student effectively considers their own development, making informed and meaningful connections to their own art-making practice.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98