- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Artist Research Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Artist Research Project Students research a visual artist and critique a piece of artwork. Rubric Code: F2W847X By csb188 Draft Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assignment Grade Levels: 9-12

Artist Research Rubric Enter rubric description
	Excellent 25 pts	Good 20 pts	Fair 15 pts	Poor 10 pts
Biographical Information Enter description	Excellent The content was related to the assignment and each question was answered in depth, going into more detail than the question asked. Bibliography was present and written in a recognized style.	Good The content was related to the assignment and each question was fully answered with the requested format. A bibliography was present.	Fair The content was related to the assignment. Answers lacked detail and questions were not fully answered. Some instructions were ignored - the format did not follow guidelines and/or a bibliography was not included.	Poor The information lacked detail and was simplistic. Some instructions were ignored - the format did not follow guidelines and/or a bibliography was not included.
Images Enter description	Excellent	Good Student found five images of the artist’s work and a picture of the artist. Each image had the information requested and in the correct format.	Fair Student found five images of the artist’s work and an image of the artist. Each image had the information requested, but the correct format was not followed.	Poor Student found fewer than five images of the artist’s work and/or is missing an image of the artist. Requested format is ignored.
Critique Enter description	Excellent Student provided an in-depth explanation of the artwork, which showed critical and analytical thinking.	Good Student provided an in-depth explanation of the artwork, which shows some depth of thought.	Fair Student provided answers to the given questions, however answers lacked detail and/or questions were not fully answered.	Poor Student missed questions or gave simplistic information when critiquing the artwork.