iRubric: Online Discussion Scoring Guide rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Online Discussion Scoring Guide

Discussion Participation Scoring Guide

This is a rubric to assess initial posts and replies.

Rubric Code: F295AC

By dapenna

Ready to use

Private Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Discussion Scoring Guide Enter rubric description
	Non-performance 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Outstanding 3 pts
Netiquette Content Requirements	Non-performance Post does not show consideration for the assignment requirements; does not add to discussion.	Fair Post partially meets the content requirements. The quality of the post (technical, spelling, and grammar is appropriate for academic submission.	Good Post provides sufficient and relevant detail to meet both content requirements. Post quotes from the required article and expands on the quoted material. The URLs for referenced/quoted material is/are provided at the bottom of Part 1. The quality of the post (technical, spelling, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission.	Outstanding Post provides substantial and relevant detail to meet both content requirements. Post quotes from the required article and expands on the quoted material. The URLs for referenced/quoted material is/are provided at the bottom of Part 1. The quality of the post (technical, spelling, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission.
Internet Research Requireme	Non-performance Post does not show consideration for the assignment requirements; does not add to discussion.	Fair Post partially meets the content requiremnents. The quality of the post (technical, spelling, and grammar is appropriate for academic submission.	Good Post provides sufficient and relevant detail to meet the content requirements. Post is basically thougt out and ideas are essentially developed. It is respectful of the ideas of others. Meets minimum requirements.	Outstanding Post is well thougt out and ideas are well developed. Post significantly enhances the discussion. It is respectful of the ideas of others. Exceeds minimum requirements.
Standards of Writing	Non-performance Posts show little or no consideration for grammar, sentence structure, punctuation or other writing standards.	Fair Posts have substantial grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation errors.	Good The quality of the posts (spelling, puctuation, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission with few grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation errors.	Outstanding The quality of the posts (spelling, puctuation, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission with no errors.
Responses	Non-performance Responses fail to meet one or more of the required criteria: number (2) quality (substantive) calendar(made on different days throughout the week)	Fair Two responses are substantive but are made on the same day.	Good Responses meet the quality/quantity/calendar requirments for posting. (Minimum calendar requirement: Respond to at least two other student’s postings at different times and on different days.) Responses are substantive and extend the discussion with additional cited research and questioning. Substantive posts require you to be reflective and require critical thinking.	Outstanding Exceeded the minimum calendar requirements. Responses are substantive and extend the discussion with additional cited research and questioning.
Enter Title
	Enter Title (N/A)	Enter Title (N/A)	Enter Title (N/A)	Enter Title (N/A)
Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title	Enter Title

Keywords:

Online Discussion

Subjects:

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric