iRubric: Visual Literacy WebQuest rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Visual Literacy WebQuest

This rubric is for the WebQuest Activity created for the CLIC VL LMS project.

Rubric Code: EXX4269

By MTrees

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Visual Literacy WebQuest Expectations for student learning outcomes after completion of a WebQuest and reflective blog.
	Poor Needs much improvement 5 pts	Fair Needs some improvement 10 pts	Good Needs no improvements 15 pts
Blog Does the content of the blog reflect the questions that were asked in the WebQuest?	Poor Missing components of many questions in the blog, with little organization of the material. Little or no references were included.	Fair Almost all questions were addressed in the blog, but not well organized, or had many grammatical errors. References were included.	Good All questions were addressed in a couple of well organized, paragraphs in the blog, with little or no grammatical errors. References were included.
VL Rhetoric Is the blog post visually appealing, and make use of design to better communicate content?	Poor VL rhetoric was not utilized by the student in the blog, and the pictures did not aid in reflection or were missing.	Fair VL rhetoric was used sometimes, and the blog contained only one image that aided in their question reflection.	Good VL rhetoric was used in the blog to create a visually appealing page that contained at least two images that were used to aid question reflections.
Collaboration Did the group members equally contribute, and add their voice to the questions asked?	Poor Did not participate well with partners on collaborative document. Either created their own document, or commented on less than half of the questions.	Fair Participated somewhat in the creation of the collaborative document by commenting on at least half of the questions, and working with partners to come to a conclusion.	Good Participated fully in the creation of the collaborative document by commenting on each question, and working with partners to come to a conclusion.
Discussion Post Did the group document get posted on time, with a description of the tool used, and two other thoughtful comments on classmates' blogs?	Poor The post was not made in a timely manner and was missing important elements such as the description of the blog tool, and classmate comments.	Fair The discussion was posted on time on the proper board. The discussion post contained a link to the group document containing appropriate blog links for group members. The post was missing one or two elements though, such a classmate comments or description of blogging tool	Good The discussion was posted on the proper board by the time assigned. The discussion post contained a link to the group document, and that group document had a link by each group member's name with their blog post. It also contained a brief sentence or two of the blogging tool used. The student made at least two meaningful content related comments were made about classmates blog posts.

Keywords:

VL, webquest, blog

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric