Skip to main content

iRubric: Honors Chemistry Lab Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Honors Chemistry Lab Report 
Rubric Code: E25WX47
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Honors Lab Report - main sections
  Poor

5.5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8.5 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Heading & Formatting

Poor

o Missing title heading
o Sections headings missing
o More than 2 incomplete sentences
o More than 5 grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization errors
Fair

o Complete & properly formatted heading
o Sections headings exist but are not formatted AND are not in correct order
o 1-2 incomplete sentences
o 3-5 grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization errors
Good

o Complete & properly formatted heading
o Sections headings exist but are not formatted OR are not in correct order
o Neatly organized with complete sentences
o 1-2 grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization errors
Excellent

o Complete & properly formatted heading
o Sections in the correct order, properly formatted section headings
o Neatly organized with complete sentences
o Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization
Introduction/Purpose

Poor

o statement of purpose OR statement of hypothesis missing
o Previous studies missing
Fair

o statement of purpose weak
o Statement of hypothesis weak
o Previous studies noted but not related to the purpose
Good

o statement of purpose given
o Statement of hypothesis
o Previous studies noted as related to the purpose
Excellent

o Complete, concise & appropriate statement of purpose
o Statement of hypothesis
o Previous studies explained and related to the purpose
Materials/methods

Poor

o missing equipment OR apparatus
o Bulleted procedure
o incomplete and inaccurate explanation of lab
o Relevant chemical equations missing
Fair

o Incomplete & accurate equipment & apparatus
o Less than 3 OR more than 5 sentences with no run-ons
o Incomplete and inaccurate explanation of lab
o Relevant chemical equations not clearly stated OR inaccurate
o Relevant, labeled diagram, as assigned by the teacher
Good

o Complete & accurate equipment OR apparatus
o 3 sentences (maximum) with no run-ons
o Complete OR accurate explanation of lab
o Relevant chemical equations stated and accurate
o Relevant, labeled diagram, as assigned by the teacher
Excellent

o Complete & accurate equipment & apparatus
o 3 sentences (maximum) with no run-ons
o Complete & accurate explanation of lab
o Relevant chemical equations stated and accurate
Data

Poor

o Missing data tables and/or graphs
o Data reported is inaccurate and incomplete, & reported without correct precision
Fair

o Incomplete OR inaccurate data tables and/or graphs
o Data reported is inaccurate OR incomplete, & reported without correct precision
Good

o Brief, complete, & accurate data tables and/or graphs
o Data reported is accurate but incomplete, & reported with correct precision
Excellent

o Brief, complete, & accurate data tables and/or graphs
o Data reported is accurate, complete, & reported with correct precision
Results

Poor

o Sample calculations are not shown
o Sample calculations are not shown
o Incomplete results
o Results not accurate AND/OR not precise
o incomplete summarized narrative of data
Fair

o Sample calculations are not shown
o Incomplete, mostly accurate, & brief results
o Results are incomplete, not accurate OR not precise
o Mostly complete summarized narrative of data
Good

o Sample calculations are shown but not clearly identified
o Complete, mostly accurate, & brief results
o Results are complete, accurate, & precise
o Mostly complete summarized narrative of data
Excellent

o Sample calculations shown & clearly identified
o Results are complete, accurate, & precise
o Complete summarized narrative of data
Conclusion
Main Idea/Hypothesis

Poor

Summarizes lab with few, if any, identification of purpose, hypothesis, claim and details; little or no use of student’s own words; reflects an incomplete or inaccurate understanding of lab.
Fair

Summarizes lab with an some identification of purpose, hypothesis, and claim and some details; minimal use of student’s own words; reflects a partial understanding of lab.
Good

Summarizes lab with an clear identification of purpose, hypothesis, claim and the important details; mostly in student’s own words; reflects a general understanding of lab.
Excellent

Summarizes lab with an effective identification of purpose, hypothesis, claim and the most significant details; in student’s own words; reflects a thorough understanding of lab.
Content

Poor

Fails to adequately identify validity of the hypothesis and details; little or no use of student’s own words; reflects an incomplete or inaccurate use of data
Fair

Attempts to adequately identify validity of the hypothesis and some details; minimal use of student’s own words; reflects a partial use of data
Good

Adequately identifies validity of the hypothesis and the important details; mostly in student’s own words; reflects a general use of data
Excellent

Effectively analyzes the validity of the hypothesis and the most significant details; in student’s own words; reflects a thorough use of data
Errors/ Recommendations/ Connection

Poor

Fails to adequately identify errors and recommendations and details; little or no use of student’s own words; reflects an incomplete or inaccurate use of real world application
Fair

Attempts to adequately identify errors and recommendations and some details; minimal use of student’s own words; reflects a partial use of real world application
Good

Adequately identifies errors and recommendations and the important details; mostly in student’s own words; reflects on a general use of real world application
Excellent

Effectively analyzes the errors and recommendations and the most significant details; in student’s own words; reflects on a thorough use of real world application
Organization and Style

Poor

Several problems with organization of summary components; inappropriate or missing transitions; repetitive or disconnected sentence structures.
Fair

Some problems with organization of summary components; some inappropriate or ineffective transitions; some repetitive or disconnected sentence structures
Good

Logical organization of summary components; clear transitions; varied sentence structures
Excellent

Sophisticated organization of summary and response components; effective transitions; varied sentence structures
Grammar Usage

Poor

Contains numerous errors in the conventions of the English language; numerous errors interfere with understanding of the writing
Fair

Contains several errors in the conventions of the English language; several errors may interfere with understanding of the writing
Good

Contains some errors in the conventions of the English language; some errors do not interfere with understanding of the writing
Excellent

Contains few, if any, errors in the conventions of the English language; few errors do not interfere with understanding of the writing.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224