iRubric: Project Charter rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Project Charter

This is the rubric for grading the Project Charter in the Group Orientation class in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v 1.0, created 03/15 by TV)

Rubric Code: DX25B3A

By mcengin

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Project Charter Enter rubric description
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts
Mechanics
Grammar and Spelling 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent No grammatical or spelling errors.	Accomplished/Good Few minor grammatical or spelling errors.	Developing/Fair Many grammatical or spelling errors.	Deficient/Poor Grammatical and spelling errors impact the ability to read the document.
Introductory Information 1 pts Group Project Name Is this a brand new project? What type of Collaboratory project is this? Project Start Date Project End Date	Exemplary/Excellent All introductory information is correct.	Accomplished/Good Error in one entry.	Developing/Fair Error in two entries.	Deficient/Poor Error in three or more entries.
Project Definition
Organizational Partner 2 pts What organizational partner has helped define the need?	Exemplary/Excellent Organizations, and not individuals or end users, are completely identified. If there are multiple organizations, they are all listed.	Accomplished/Good Individuals or end users are identified, not organizations, but all involved organizations are identified somehow.	Developing/Fair Organizations, and not individuals or end users, are completely identified, but not all organizations are identified.	Deficient/Poor Individuals or end users are identified, not organizations, and not all involved organizations are identified.
Need 4 pts Describe the need this project is going to meet. Who cares and why?	Exemplary/Excellent The need rather than the proposed solution has been described. The particular end-user(s) have been identified.	Accomplished/Good The need rather than the proposed solution has been described, but not all end-user(s) have been identified.	Developing/Fair The proposed solution rather than the need has been described. The particular end-user(s) have been identified.	Deficient/Poor The proposed solution rather than the need has been described, and not all of the end-user(s) have been identified.
Meeting Need 2 pts How do you propose to meet this need?	Exemplary/Excellent The proposed solution to meet the need is clearly spelled out.	Accomplished/Good It is difficult to clearly picture the proposed solution	Developing/Fair It is even MORE difficult to clearly picture the proposed solution.	Deficient/Poor No solution is proposed or they just say “we intend to fix this problem”.
Deliverables 4 pts What will your project produce, and how will you measure success?	Exemplary/Excellent A clear definition of all the appropriate deliverables and the means by which those will deliverables will be evaluated is given.	Accomplished/Good A clear definition of all the appropriate deliverables is given, but the means by which those will deliverables will be evaluated is not given.	Developing/Fair Definitions of only some of appropriate deliverables is given, and the means by which those will deliverables will be evaluated is given.	Deficient/Poor Deliverables are not defined and no means for evaluating those are given.
Documentation 1 pts How will this project document progress and results?	Exemplary/Excellent All appropriate documentation is described.	Accomplished/Good Most of the appropriate documentation is described.	Developing/Fair Only some of the appropriate documentation is described.	Deficient/Poor Documentation is not described.
Space and Equipment 1 pts What academic laboratory space and equipment does the project need?	Exemplary/Excellent Complete and accurate description of space and equipment requirements.	Accomplished/Good Accurate description of some of the space and equipment requirements, but some of the requirements are not included.	Developing/Fair Accurate description of some of the space and equipment requirements, but mostof the requirements are not included.	Deficient/Poor Neither complete, nor accurate description of space and equipment requirements.
Team
Advisor and Team Members 1 pts Lead Advisor Current Team Members	Exemplary/Excellent Advisor and team members are all correctly listed.	Accomplished/Good Team members are all correctly listed, but advisor is not.	Developing/Fair Most team members are correctly listed and adviser is not listed.	Deficient/Poor Only a few team members are listed.

Keywords:

Messiah College, IPC, Project Charter

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric